Which election put these “Palestinian politicians” into office, specifically?
Are you implying that “not being on a ballot” means it is OK to murder people?
Are you implying that having certain beliefs about warfare means it’s OK to murder people?
No, they clearly aren’t, dumbass
Its great seeing all the same arguments used to justify the US war on Iraq (where they murdered a million innocent people) again in 2025. Thanks, I needed to see this today. /s
It’s great seeing leftists pretend that genocidal warlords are just “politicians”, the left used to know the difference
Go off rudyard kipling / winston churchill, you tell those barbarian middle-easterners and asians just how superior you are. /s
“Womp womp” - Some republican, mocking the suffering of others on fox news
I think the above quote sums up the world’s reaction pretty nicely
Beyond even that, they praise inviting people to negotiate and then murdering those negotiators.
I pray for the safety of the Luigi’s in our world. They gave us hope that we lost in politicians.
Words can be weapons as well. Not all who slay beasts do so with metal.
Universe 25
No it’s ok because they always say it has no place in the United States
Palestine is a-ok!
And Yemen of course. Where Israel bombed the entire cabinet last week
Political violence is a trademark of the Coca-Cola company ffs nobody gives a shit about intellectual property anymore
Right on the money.
More money.
That last one almost makes it seem like non-political violence is OK?
Itsafraid.jpeg
Where are these liberals? I’m only seeing celebrations or “I don’t condone but in this case I don’t care either” for the fascist getting shot.
Or were you hearing them condemn gun violence for the school shooting that also occurred today?
Newsom, for one.
I’ve seen a lot of posts condemning political violence. Newsom, Bernie, Harris, Waltz, AOC.
I haven’t seen any of them praising the assassination of Palestinians though.
Agreed, at best this is confirmation bias at play
Removed by mod
Then there must be some mismatch between what actual liberal leaders are saying, and their followers.
Pretty sure we saw that with Luigi too
Where are these liberals?
They are lurking everywhere in the .ml brain-rotted hive-mind
“Everyone to the left of me cannot be principled, they all must be a hive-mind!!!111!!11!”
“liberals” being whatever you need the term to mean in the moment.
The politics understander has trouble believing US democrats are in fact, liberals.
Sure, today you mean top Democrats, tomorrow you mean anyone a hair to the right of Marx.
So your complaint is that, while they are using the term correctly now, in the future they might not be? Are you an idiot or just a troll?
Are you stupid? My complaint is that they call everyone they don’t like a liberal.
If the person that is a hair to the right of Marx defend capitalism surprise surprise he is a liberal.
I’m sure you’ll accuse them of doing so, yes.
I think we should issue dueling pistols to politicians if you have a disagreement, settle it at 12 paces.
I demand satisfaction, good sir!
I agree let’s bring back dueling for politicians
This would be more meaningful if the type of person posting it wasn’t doing the exact same thing with the parties reversed. Why is it so terrifying for people to have a modicum of compassion and empathy for all sentient life, or if not that at least human life. Having compassion and empathy is not endorsement, is not supporting their cause, does not reduce you.
I celebrate Kirk’s murder precisely because I have empathy. I am fully aware of the harm Kirk and his ilk have caused. How many women were sexually assaulted because their rapists were motivated by Kirk? How many minorities were discriminated against or had hate crimes perpetrated against them because of Charlie ‘I Think Empathy Isn’t Real’ Kirk? It is impossible to have empathy for people and not hate Kirk’s guts.
@astutemural @jerkface
👏👏👏👏👏👏
Bella Ciao
Removed by mod
Why did you need ai for this
Better question, why did our lovely mods remove it?
To tell it to say:
Jerkface’s appeal to empathy and non-endorsement.
Hypothetically, how would that benefit me?
He must think it’s a trustable source. I feel bad honestly, he’s gonna learn eventually though
Are these liberals in the room with you?
Its a reference to this.
in America
Yeah they just mean it’s not okay here so it’s still fine for them to be okay with it in other countries.
Fuck that’s depressing it’s most likely their actual reasoning. Or that they just don’t care
Yeah but to complete the square, there has to be praise for the murder of Palestinian politicians. I assume that’s about the strike in Doha and a brief search only shows them “being concerned” over it, not praising it. Of course it’s a meme so there’s no point litigating the accuracy to the T. I’m sure things aren’t the same behind closed doors. But if there’s a src for the lib praising Palestinian politicians’ deaths that would be helpful.
They consistently demonize the Houthis, Hamas, and anyone fighting for their lives against Israel. Only a single democrat (Omar) didn’t give standing ovations to Netanyahu when he visited congress earlier this year.
Someone else I’m sure has collected plenty of these.
Ah yeah, if you cast a wider timeline net then there’s definitely been praise for killing Palestinian politicians.
Removed by mod
Includes AOC, Sanders, and Mamdani too, so I guess we lump them in with the liberals again.
3 democrat politicians who follow the party line on US imperialism, “condemning hamas” and supporting Israel’s wars.
Mamdani has so far never condemned any Palestinian resistance groups* nor supported Israel. The others have.
Mamdani condemns hamas just like every other democrat:
Thank you for finding this quote. It’s certainly not a great look. He does specifically condemn the action of killing of civilians. Which is lingo similar to how Europe recently condemned Israeli bombings on Qatar, while not condemning Israel itself but it’s not a great look.
He has another one where he says he supports Israel’s right to exist, but not as a Jewish state, but as a state with equal rights for everyone. Which in practice means that he doesn’t believe Israel has the right to exist, but it’s a great way to answer the question in a way that satisfies libs.
That said, I don’t think it’s possible to do anything about the October 7 libs without doing any of this kind of dodgy answering.
It’s a simple matter of fact that many if not most of us, at least in NA have started with the default lib programming. There clearly is a path through deprogramming that creates likeminded people who then support people like Zohran. Playing the word gymnastics like Mamdani does enables libs to take on some of these ideas instead of rejecting all of them because of one thought-terminating slogan. That puts them on the deprogramming path. I don’t think this contradicts any long-term leftist goals.
He has to. Otherwise he’s got no path to office. That said the status quo has moved enough to make criticizing Israel a net positive among D electorate.
This actually just means parliamentarism/electoralism is a sham, workarounds to it or entryism be damned.
That’s just nuance and working with the public. He’s literally pro-palestinian. I don’t understand why we need to paint everybody as an enemy because, what, they haven’t asked for the expulsion of every last Israeli?
I don’t think we’re doing that. We can critique our own and we should. We should do a lot more of this before a candidate is locked in for an election. That doesn’t mean we don’t vote for those candidates at the election. I think almost anyone here who lives in NYC would vote for Zohran.
It’s because ml’s aren’t trying to strategically win power and influence within the current system – they want to tear it down completely. Mamdani and Trump are just 2 parts of the same whole to them.
nor supported Israel
‘Israel has the right to exist’ he said, then added ‘as a state with equal rights’
Israel is by definition not a state with equal rights. This is a great way to answer the question to statisfy libs while also showing the issue with Israel: their Apartheid. Which is the raison d’etre of Israel as a Jewish ethnostate. Adding the equal rights part means believing Israel doesn’t have a right to exist.
Liberal Zionism is still Zionism and so is the two-state solution proposed by the West, no matter how you put it. This is still clear-as-day support for a Euroanglo-Zionazi state. Please don’t fall for prophetic entryism.
For Palestinians, to be subjected to almost a century of Lebensraum from Europeans and now recently others from other Western nations and then be told “Hey! Maybe we should live together in harmony with rainbows and sunshine to share!” is degrading beyond comprehension. Adding “with equal rights” means jack squat.
Not a single inch for Euroanglo-Zionazis. They know exactly where they come from.
Ah yes, known supporter of Israel, Zohran Mamdani.
Eww Newsweek
Ok and? Are all these liberal leaders tweets and statements directly linked there fabricated?
It’s about not bringing revenue to a fascist mouthpiece.
