- 18 Posts
- 18 Comments
313·16 hours agoCould be a coping mechanism. If they took it seriously they would probably have to reflect about the similarities between the Nazis and Israel.
23·22 hours agoIf you stick to FPTP and both parties deteriorate your conditions you will never reach improvement.
Your argument has led to what we see now.
If popular “progressive” Democrats would leave the party it could bring enough momentum. But those figures, like Sanders, appear hell bent on having a final Cheney for the road.
Lesser evilism. Has started to reach its ultimate destination. Fascism vs slightly less fascism.
Dems have already decided there will be no progressive in 2028. Nor ever after that. If you are hoping for a progressive better start organizing around a third party.
Nobody ever got hurt by an innocent Sieg heil am i right.
At least I can’t recall they ever did.
But if they did, I’m sure Poland would build a giant memorial for students to visit and learn about people getting hurt by Sieg Heils.
Which we have no way to know exists unless it is mentioned in the article headline.
Also for those curious, watch one minute of this to understand Daniella Weiss and what Zionism is https://youtu.be/V-w_SbhFRLo?t=240
21·4 days agoThanks for your insight 23 hour old account.
Rabin was not considering peace though. He was considering how to string Palestinians along with a bad deal and keep the Apartheid in place. Rabin was selling the liberal-Zionist illusion of a peace process.
Netanyahu on the other hand tries to do the same thing but destroys Israels reputation in the process.
With someone like Rabin, Palestinians would be living under the same conditions but Saudi etc would have normalized with Israel.
Rabin knew that he could not do what Netanyahu is doing or he would destroy the Apartheids state.
+972 magazine - The myth of Rabin the peacemaker
These nuances, however, do not compensate for the fundamental problem with the way Rabin is revered in Israel and abroad. His persona as a “warrior-turned-peacemaker” is almost exclusively centered on the final four years of his life, five decades of which were defined by hawkish and militaristic views (Shimon Peres, Rabin’s rival-turned-ally, eventually received the same idolizing treatment). This cult of personality, dotingly crafted by the Zionist left in Israel and liberal Zionists in the United States, has particularly relied on a counterfactual argument: that had he not been killed, Rabin might have helped to bring about a two-state solution.
Ironically, the first person to dispute that narrative may have been Rabin himself. The words “Palestinian state” do not appear in the accords he signed, a fact that he and other Israeli officials were careful to ensure. A month before his assassination, Rabin told the Knesset that his vision was to give Palestinians “an entity which is less than a state” — a precedent to the “state-minus” advocated today by Netanyahu and outlined in Trump’s “Deal of the Century.” Rabin also insisted that the Jordan Valley would remain Israel’s “security border” — the very plan that drew international outcry this year, when Netanyahu pledged to formally annex the area.
Israel cannot guarantee their safety because you know, Israel might bomb them during a ceasefire.
Normally Democrats only start voting with Republicans at the big donor bills. This is a really weird hill for these Dems to die on.
We shall see if Trump will cover and lie for Netanyahu like Biden did.
Sheesh, Joe Biden letting the genocide go on until the exact end of his presidency to kill as many Palestinians as possible. What a horrible person. Imagine Biden could have ended the genocide with a single phone call for more than a year. Like Trump just did.
So why are Democrats already spinning their comments as if Biden is achieving a ceasefire right now?
They are afraid to get deported for replying.