• aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Maybe so. But if there’s any possibility it’s a genuine need, don’t ruin a baby’s chance to get fed.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Uhhh?

      These people stripped shelves empty, causing many babies to go hungry because nothing was in stock.

      • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Unless you’re that store’s manager, you should be more upset that people who are hungry aren’t being fed to the point they resort to theft.

        Actually, you should be more upset by that either way. I understand not wanting to support theft of food just to eat but something is wrong when you condemn it.

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I support theft of food to eat.

          I don’t support organised crime denying babies food.

          • shneancy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            you cannot know which one is which when you see a person shoplifting

            if you snitch on them, there are two outcomes:

            • whoever organised the crime of stealing baby formula doesn’t get their daily quota from the person they told to do it, and either helps or punishes the person desperate enough to go and do the actual shoplifting for them. You helped a corporation avoid theft

            • a baby goes without food, and an already impoverished parent is financially, legally, or socially punished. You helped a corporation avoid theft

            is it worth it to possibly make a mother cry as her baby goes hungry, to try to help a corporation?