• Zxq@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Can you please expound upon that point, re: Jesus didn’t proclaim himself to be the literal son of God. Never heard that before.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Sure. So in Islam we believe that God and the creation are seperate. All Prophets (peace be upon them) are humans, who have been given prophethood for their virtuous character. Any powers outside the realm of human capacities were granted by God to aid their mission, but it wasn’t their inherent powers.

      For a longer read on this from an Islamic perspective i found this article: https://www.reviewofreligions.org/27744/jesus-son-of-god-historical-context-long-read/

      As for the development of the Christian idea that Jesus would be the son of God. This is a Greek/Roman idea that was pushed to dominance around the fourth century. Notable is the Council of Nicae, where it was agreed that the concept of Trinity (with Jesus as son of God and some abstract holy spirit) should be the used. As for the reason why, it is likely that the Trinity was chosen to make Christianity more palatable to Polytheists, despite the rejection of polytheism and embrace of monotheism being fundamental to the Abrahamic religions. This is also why the concept is strongly rejected by Jews and Muslims. However also Nontrinitarian Christians exist to this day.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea#Outcomes
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nontrinitarian#History

      • Zxq@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        That’s an interesting take. Having been raised Christian, but now mostly agnostic, it’s a view I had not heard before. Thanks for sharing this.