Experts suggested that more data and education are needed as Texas and the rest of the country build in known flood plains.

  • SheeEttin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If lenders require insurance, and insurers won’t cover it, shouldn’t it stop happening anyway?

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        Depends where your “flood zone” is… If your coastal you get heavy subsidies, if your inland (barring being near some large rivers and lakes) you are subsidizing the coast.

        I have to pay flood insurance for a dry brook that hasn’t flooded in its history. It costs over $1,200 a year for my 160k house. If I could get private flood insurance the cost would be 2 to 300, possibly even less.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          You may be able to dispute that. I had a similar requirement, and it turns out the maps they based their decisions on were very out of date. I live on a hill that even a 30 foot swell wouldn’t touch. It took a while,and we had to work with the state emergency agency, but we were able to remove the requirement.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Yeah, there is a whole LOMA (Letter of Map Adjustment) process. However it’s super confusing, and I am 95% sure I will have to hire a land surveyor for 1-2k to get it done, due to no recent maps of the area.