No, she’s against intentional, purposeful alteration of weather and climate.
Things like geo-engineering or regulation designed to reduce the impact of climate change fall under that category, while pollution for profit is just unintentional collateral damage that wouldn’t be impacted by her legislation.
No, she’s against intentional, purposeful alteration of weather and climate.
Things like geo-engineering or regulation designed to reduce the impact of climate change fall under that category, while pollution for profit is just unintentional collateral damage that wouldn’t be impacted by her legislation.
Totally, I agree with you. She’s a blight on our planet.
Just wanted to say I was being sarcastic.