Researchers have uncovered four distinct types of autism, each with its own genetic fingerprint, which could unlock the mystery of what causes the condition and how it can be treated.
I’m sure there is, but just because you don’t like them doesn’t mean that ALL of their stuff is bad. Reading the article, it’s obvious that they didn’t make the story up. I read the Daily Mail every single day, and it’s really no worse than US news sites. And in fact, many times they break news before I read it on US news sites.
Yes my ulterior motive is is not reading things from extremely unreliable news sources which regularly push agendas which hurt people I care about. If you’re dumb enough to actually pay for that shit you have nothing useful to say. Shut up for ever, please
Your attitude make it seem like you haven’t read the article. If you don’t like it, don’t read it. Do you realize how cringe it is to get mad because someone reads something you don’t like. It’s almost as if you have fascist tendencies. Do you think books should be burned too? Hmmm…
Wow, more insults. Do you have a problem with reading social clues and getting along with people? Did you read the article? Because it may be of particular interest to you. That’s not an insult, but in our exchange, you are being very rude and it seems to me like you are misunderstanding my replies.
I told you, I want a source that isn’t known for making things up. But then imbeciles like you have never been good at listening to anything that doesn’t tell you exactly what you already want to hear
I’m sure there is, but just because you don’t like them doesn’t mean that ALL of their stuff is bad. Reading the article, it’s obvious that they didn’t make the story up. I read the Daily Mail every single day, and it’s really no worse than US news sites. And in fact, many times they break news before I read it on US news sites.
It’s a fascist shitrag and regularly makes things up. Never trust them as a source, and definitely stop reading them every day
Nope. Funny how you have to bring up politics in a non-political comm, though. Seems like you have some ulterior motive here.
I like them and I even have a paid subscription. thx
Yes my ulterior motive is is not reading things from extremely unreliable news sources which regularly push agendas which hurt people I care about. If you’re dumb enough to actually pay for that shit you have nothing useful to say. Shut up for ever, please
Your attitude make it seem like you haven’t read the article. If you don’t like it, don’t read it. Do you realize how cringe it is to get mad because someone reads something you don’t like. It’s almost as if you have fascist tendencies. Do you think books should be burned too? Hmmm…
Huh, I didn’t know you could get dumber
Wow, more insults. Do you have a problem with reading social clues and getting along with people? Did you read the article? Because it may be of particular interest to you. That’s not an insult, but in our exchange, you are being very rude and it seems to me like you are misunderstanding my replies.
I told you, I want a source that isn’t known for making things up. But then imbeciles like you have never been good at listening to anything that doesn’t tell you exactly what you already want to hear
Again with the name calling. And what exactly do I “want to hear” in an article about autism?