edit: seems like some people interpret “full of” as a mathematical majority which, while it may or might not be true instance to instance, isn’t my intent in posting
feel free to swap in “has a lot of” if that’s more familiar language to you :)
edit: seems like some people interpret “full of” as a mathematical majority which, while it may or might not be true instance to instance, isn’t my intent in posting
feel free to swap in “has a lot of” if that’s more familiar language to you :)
Whose crimes were downplayed?
Slaveholders’ crimes were downplayed and the history of the Confederacy rewritten to appear noble and unrelated to slavery. Some slaveholders were even compensated financially for the freeing of their slaves, while no freed people were compensated, ever.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Cause_of_the_Confederacy
Did you skip history class again, son?
No, I wasn’t sure if you were distinguishing between Nuremberg or the slave owners. You write “their” but there are two possible groups that could be applied to, and possibly both. Your message changes based on how I read “their”, so just seeking clarification on what you’re trying to say.
If you follow the original subject of the conversation, you’ll see that the Nuremberg mention modifies the other, thus you have your target group. It wasn’t History you skipped?