• zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    She had so many chances to make this election easier. Could have had a Palestinian talk during the DNC, and that would have likely changed this story.

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’d have to be an idiot to make another countries conflict an election issue, when neither candidate supports your side. The fact that neither candidate is pro Palestine, it’s a moot point in terms of the election

      • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You’d have to be an idiot to make another countries conflict an election issue

        apply this to Ukraine :)

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        So, a conflict where USA supply weapons and all other manners of support used for open genocide (btw illegally, US law declare US need to stop in such case, but Blinken and co blocked it) and is even sending US soldiers to serve as a missile bait, isn’t an issue for US voters according to you?

        Nice democracy you think they should have there.

      • davel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Is this a joke? This genocide is as much our “conflict” as it is Israel’s, given that Israel wouldn’t be able to do what it’s doing without massive US financial, materiel, and political support. It’s absolutely an election issue. You can say it’s not ’till the cows come home, but uncommitted is as real as death & taxes.