☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
- 1.45K Posts
- 803 Comments
That’s right history starts on February 2022, nothing happened before then. 🤡
Pretty sure a large chunk of Americans think that Russia is still communist.
I love how you can post an article from one of the most rabidly pro Ukrainian publications here and libs will swarm in with downvotes because it doesn’t conform to their fantasies.
libs and engaging with reality challenge impossible
3·8 hours agoThey talk about how Israel wants to break up Syria to to keep it weak. Even if Syria doesn’t break up into separate states, the sectarian tensions will likely keep it internally divided for the foreseeable future.
1·8 hours agoMy prediction is that the tariffs are a bluff, and not even a credible one at that. We already saw what happened with the tariffs where they were immediately rolled back. It’s pretty clear that the US is not in a position to impose the type of economic pressure Trump is threatening.
clearly my journalistic standards are too high for them 🤣
18th package is gonna be the one
Sure, the article would’ve been better if it contextualized the data. I’m just pointing out that it’s not difficult to find for those interested.
it literally takes under a minute to find this info
Europe is headed for some dark times.
Finally Trump is doing something positive for the world.
Also, it’s incredible how the author acknowledges that Ukraine’s situation has steadily deteriorated over the past three years, then proceeds advocating more of the same. The article ignores the fact that the west has already tried applying maximum pressure on Russia, and tries to drum up the whole triumph of the will thing.
Pretty sure the only people servicing Donnie are the ones running around calling him daddy.
The fact that Russia will win has been the expert consensus throughout the war, and at this point it’s becoming obvious that it’s the only possible outcome.
Petit Jupiter strikes again.
very much agree with all taht
I find it helps to develop a mindset of thinking in terms of dynamic systems where you can identify forces acting upon the system and try to understand likely ways the system will evolve as whole. For example, if we’re dealing with capitalist relations be it today or a century ago, the forces within the system form an invariant. We have people who own substantial capital and those who do not. Their interests form a contradiction because they are fundamentally opposed to each other. If I’m a business owner then my desire is to minimize my costs an maximize profits, while if I’m a worker selling my labour I want to maximize my salary and benefits. Once we frame the problem in these terms we can try to think about potential resolutions to these contradictions, and that’s where historical record becomes informative. If we can identify similar situations in the past, they can inform us on what we can expect going forward.
One of the most hilarious things of late has been libs, who see themselves as a paragon of rationality, expose that they’re just a different flavor of qAnon.