- cross-posted to:
- programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
For us this design is closer to marketing’s portrayal. The design is a tiger that has lost his tail, is slightly inbred, and has a bit of mange. The implementation looks like this implementation after a dog has used it as a chew toy.
implementation without design
I like how his original eyes look angry lol
That’s a biblically accurate implementation if ever I’ve seen one.
yeah, that’s pretty messed up. you should never cross spiders with teddy bears.
Disgusting. Never before has a spider stuck its tongue out at me.
The implementation is cute. I would like that plushie.
Sometimes a simpler solution solves 99% of the problem for 50% of the effort and the client is happy.
I mean id buy that. Ees cute.
I mean if the implementation is that compact without any sticking edges and you avoided the temptation to, say, tape a wing or a unicorn horn on it, that is a pretty good implementation imo.
This reminds me of a toy one of my kids got given from my mum.
Apparently it was a giraffe. A giraffe without the one defining feature of a giraffe.
Wildlife could be better without correct form.
i haven’t seen this video in ages
Haha I knew what this was even before I clicked 😆
A weird bee.
Cover art vs gameplay
Why every MBA is an ‘idea person’.
That hurts.
Like and reblog if you think the girl on the right is just as beautiful as the girl on the left ❤️
Great design. Cute implementation.
