Stamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 4 days agoToxic Masculinitylemmy.worldimagemessage-square142fedilinkarrow-up11.34Karrow-down133
arrow-up11.31Karrow-down1imageToxic Masculinitylemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 4 days agomessage-square142fedilink
minus-squarelennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up10·3 days agoReally, Rule 2 should be enough. Inanimate objects can’t give consent.
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 days agoIt’s future proofing for when fuckable robots are a thing.
minus-squarelennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 days agoEh, I’ll worry about that if and when we get to that point. Who knows, maybe they turn out really fuckable.
minus-squareGloomy@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-22 days agoThe Hierarchies by Rob Anderson explores this concept trough the eyes of a sex robot. Just in case you ever wondered what a word with realy fuckable robots would look like.
Really, Rule 2 should be enough. Inanimate objects can’t give consent.
It’s future proofing for when fuckable robots are a thing.
Eh, I’ll worry about that if and when we get to that point. Who knows, maybe they turn out really fuckable.
The Hierarchies by Rob Anderson explores this concept trough the eyes of a sex robot. Just in case you ever wondered what a word with realy fuckable robots would look like.
Tell that to a dildo
Yours can talk?
…yours can’t?