Russia shares a border with Ukraine from which it can use medium-range systems to deliver missiles much more reliably and with fewer risks. Attacking nuclear bombers is a stupid escalation that could see the rest of us engulfed in nuclear fire, you fucking dumbass.
I’ll give you a hypothetical. Your car is set on fire. You loved that car, maintained it daily, polished it like it was your own sexual organ that lacks a clitoris. Once you get over your grief, you remember the 3 identical cars in identical condition that you keep at your other houses. Would you consider moving one of those to the house you’re using?
It might be difficult to move something heavy, like a car, from one location to another but if you really wanted to, you might find a way irl. For this hypothetical, we’ll just say that you’ve figured out how to move the car from one location to another.
The definition of misogyny has changed since I went to school, apparently, if suggesting that people with clitorises can masturbate is all it takes. I apologize. I’ve edited my comment to reflect your worldview.
One has to have a brain as smooth as a bowling ball to believe that Russia shuttles their strategic nuclear bombers from Siberia and back just to bomb Ukraine. Not to mention that the point of those bombers is for them to be used in case of a nuclear war with the US. If Russia actually did what you’re suggesting then they’d be exposing themselves to a first strike while their nuclear bombers were away. You are completely and utterly clueless, and frankly should be deeply embarrassed by the misogynistic word salad you wrote there. I recommend going back to reddit where you can hang out with individuals who engage at your intellectual level.
I couldn’t tell whether you were being intentionally obtuse, my actually ableist, ostensibly chan-raiding friend, but I’ll explain again. They’ve used nearby bombers. If all of the nearby nuclear-cable bombers, which had been used, were destroyed, do you believe they would cease to use their nuclear-capable bombers or dip into their stock? I can tell you what Ukraine believed their aggressor would do.
Russia shares a border with Ukraine from which it can use medium-range systems to deliver missiles much more reliably and with fewer risks. Attacking nuclear bombers is a stupid escalation that could see the rest of us engulfed in nuclear fire, you fucking dumbass.
Nuclear bombers which, once again, have been used to launch non-nuclear munitions. Reported for incivility.
Except nuclear bombers in Siberia are not being used to launch anything into Ukraine. This is just bullshit you’re spewing because you’re a troll.
I’ll give you a hypothetical. Your car is set on fire. You loved that car, maintained it daily, polished it like it was your own sexual organ that lacks a clitoris. Once you get over your grief, you remember the 3 identical cars in identical condition that you keep at your other houses. Would you consider moving one of those to the house you’re using?
It might be difficult to move something heavy, like a car, from one location to another but if you really wanted to, you might find a way irl. For this hypothetical, we’ll just say that you’ve figured out how to move the car from one location to another.
The same person who is calling people abelist is being a weird misogynist, very cool
The definition of misogyny has changed since I went to school, apparently, if suggesting that people with clitorises can masturbate is all it takes. I apologize. I’ve edited my comment to reflect your worldview.
One has to have a brain as smooth as a bowling ball to believe that Russia shuttles their strategic nuclear bombers from Siberia and back just to bomb Ukraine. Not to mention that the point of those bombers is for them to be used in case of a nuclear war with the US. If Russia actually did what you’re suggesting then they’d be exposing themselves to a first strike while their nuclear bombers were away. You are completely and utterly clueless, and frankly should be deeply embarrassed by the misogynistic word salad you wrote there. I recommend going back to reddit where you can hang out with individuals who engage at your intellectual level.
I couldn’t tell whether you were being intentionally obtuse, my actually ableist, ostensibly chan-raiding friend, but I’ll explain again. They’ve used nearby bombers. If all of the nearby nuclear-cable bombers, which had been used, were destroyed, do you believe they would cease to use their nuclear-capable bombers or dip into their stock? I can tell you what Ukraine believed their aggressor would do.
The assumption, my dear misogynist, that Russia is running out of nuclear capable bombers is entirely unsubstantiated.
Not what I said, implied, or even really asked, my Chan-poisoned friend
So, what you’re saying is that you just spewed some incoherent drivel without any actual point to it. Gotcha.