• Maki@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Don’t overengineer the prototype. Make it simple and efficient as a jumping off platform to lead to further developments down the road. Any open printer project doesn’t have to start with the technology the proprietary models have. They just have to be proof-of-concept that it’s doable. Once that’s proven, further developments can be made down the line. Dot matrix is easy to create and cheap to produce compared to the overengineered systems proprietary models use nowadays and it would work as a stepping stone toward that further development.

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      That makes sense. If you’re going that route though you should be fairly safe patent wise I would think? Most of the dot matrix patents, if not all, have to be expired by now?

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        You would still need to explore patents. Just because patents exist, doesn’t mean they are in use. I would not be surprised to find out that a company like HP would hunt down and buy any patents that could interfere with its profits just to prevent others from using them.

          • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Patent infringement is about use, not price

            It’s total bullshit that stifles innovation but such is life in the USA. At least the period isn’t completely obscene like copyright