• tias@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    As an experienced software dev I’m convinced my software quality has improved by using AI. More time for thinking and less time for execution means I can make more iterations of the design and don’t have to skip as many nice-to-haves or unit tests on account of limited time. It’s not like I don’t go through every code line multiple times anyway, I don’t just blindly accept code. As a bonus I can ask the AI to review the code and produce documentation. By the time I’m done there’s little left of what was originally generated.

    • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      As an experienced software dev I’m convinced my software quality has improved by using AI.

      Then your software quality was extreme shit before. It’s still shit, but an improvement. So, yay “AI”, I guess?

      • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        That seems like just wishful thinking on your part, or maybe you haven’t learned how to use these tools properly.

        • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 minutes ago

          Na, the tools suck. I’m not using a rubber hammer to get woodscrews into concrete and I’m not using “AI” for something that requires a brain. I’ve looked at “AI” suggestions for coding and it was >95% garbage. If “AI” makes someone a better coder it tells more about that someone than “AI”.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      As an experienced software dev, I know better than to waste my time writing boilerplate that can be vomited up by an LLM, since somebody else has already written it and I should just use that instead.