• Alerian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m quite amazed at the amount of hate in this thread. They were using a tax loophole to do fiscal optimization and anti competitive practice, now they won’t be able to. All this ultra liberalism is really ridiculous.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I was wondering how they were going to protect intermediaries from the growth of desintermediation platforms were consumers buy things from the factories or just the next link on the chain down from that.

    Because intermediaries are the ones making lots of money importing the same stuff as people are now buying direct, putting a label on it, and selling it locally for at least 3x the price and their business model is threatened by consumers buying directly from the places were all the factories are.

    Mind you, I’m all for less stuff being made in China and more in Europe, I just don’t think the Commission is doing this for that reason, since historically they tend to do what’s best for “business” and a lot of “business” in Europe is just being a brand for junk made in China or some other non-European country with cheap labour.

    • sour@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Any low cost item, though?

      What about my 20ct LEDs? Or the 2.50 ESP32?

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s a sacrifice I’m willing to accept if it slows down people buying stuff mindlessly. Your 20ct LEDs delivery is being subsidised by European post services. Now it won’t.

        • microcapybara@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 days ago

          Absolutely! I also love access to small, cheap electronic bits for my projects, and at the same time I’m all for protecting our postal services. A 2€ per package surcharge doesn’t practically change anything on the economy side. Temu already expects a minimum purchase of something like 20€.

          My small concern with this is how it will be applied/processed by the carriers. I hope it doesn’t end up like the customs/VAT on larger packages, where they charge 10-20€ for customs clearance. But now that I write it down, for me, even that isn’t a complete blocking factor. I’d probably spend more time comparing the value of ordering direct vs from a local reseller, which is exactly the goal.

        • B0rax@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          How is „per package“ defined? Per shipper? Per order? Per seller? How about one shipment that includes items for multiple people that are split in a local warehouse and resend?

          • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I’d assume it’s per physical package entering the EU. The chinese sellers have been sending many small packages to go below tax limits, so they’ll probably have to change strategy.

            • B0rax@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I guess that depends on the country. In Germany it is the opposite, because the limit is 0€, so they send them in big „packages“ (actually one container at a time) and distribute it in their own distribution center from inside the country.

              • vaionko@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                All of my recent Aliexpress purchases have come from the Netherlands, I assume there’s some big distribution center there

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Did you care to read the article? There’s a real cost involved in handling these packages that is not being paid by customers nor by companies, but by the post services. I’m all for moving these costs to the people actually doing the buying. Bulk purchases are jot affected by this so things in general are not getting more expensive with this, but only individual deliveries.

        • oldfart@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I did not, actually, because it’s behind a paywall. I’ve linked and read another one in the comments but it fails to mention about post offices and says the money is going to customs.

  • FrustratedArtist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lol. “Hey, so people are buying cheaper overseas goods, what should we do to sway them to buy local stuff? Create local factories to produce these things within the union? Lower VAT on locally produced goods? Naaah, let’s add another tax on top of existing ones.” Fucking parasites.

    • rubyorsmth@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well its pretty hard to compete with local factories if they can produce it with significantly lower costs due to terrible worker conditions and child labor

  • Libb@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Taxing to death is not the answer. Even Trump with its ‘liberation day’ knows what’s needed is to re-localize the actual production and that taxing importation to death is only a mean to that end. Save in the EU, I suppose…

    It’s so tiring.

    • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Other than small electronic components this tax will affect landfill junk and garbage, will it not?

      • Libb@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Hard to say. It mostly depends how much people are willing to purchase those useless goods and, then, how many people are willing to provide them an easy way to purchase those at the cheapest cost. If it’s not China, it could be some other place. Think fashion if you want to understand how I consider the issue: it’s a huge business with little sense to it when you think about it. Most people own way too much clothes already, more then what they would need in their lifetime but it’s still not enough and they keep on buying more following trends and fashions, spending good money on something they don’t need and they happily completely disregard the many environmental issues as well as the human ones (modern day slavery, child labor and so on). Because it’s what they like and what they want an,d because it’s so easy to buy a new pair of jeans or a skirt.

        Most people are lazy and they like simplicity above anything else. Simplicity helps them stay lazy. They like that even above saving money or protecting their fundamentals rights as citizens (or to keeping breathable the air and the water they need to stay alive), they like it more than getting a better (but more demanding) education, and so on. We’re lazy everywhere, most of us at least. And I mean everywhere, including here when commenting: I got two comments, including yours, to my message while a majority of people silently downvoted it. The thing is their clicking of a button won’t help anyone (certainly not me) understand why my comment may or may not have deserved to be downvoted but writing and explaining their point of view, or their reasoning, instead of simply clicking that button is already too much work for them.

        So, yeah I may be wrong that’s a sure thing but I don’t think a tax will change much in the amount of waste we create. Alas, it will be produced (and purchased) from some other place, end of the story.

    • ikt@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      trump wants relocation of manufacturing but how many Americans or Europeans want to work in a factory making 20 cent trinkets all day?

      most countries try to move up the value chain

      • Libb@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        trump wants relocation of manufacturing but how many Americans or Europeans want to work in a factory making 20 cent trinkets all day?

        None, true that.

        The thing is that most of those ‘MAGA’ or ‘MEUGA’ jobs will be automatized/robotized and even less people will be happy about not having a job at all than having a poorly paid one. But it’s coming whether we want it or not. The only unknown is how fast?

  • gnygnygny@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    This oligarchy only knows to rise taxes. One more time that will take a part of those taxes for their own privileges