You could have had some great points, but the fact that you use “microslop” unironically shows how much of a bias you have. Meaning your points might as well not exist.
You sound like an anti-vaxxer blaming everything wrong with their life on big pharma.
WSL is inherently flawed because it isn’t fully integrated with the kernel. WSL is literally an abstraction layer of linux that sits on top of the existing windows device. it’s no better than cygwin. microslop developed a way to run VMs and mount the whole c drive inside it, that’s WSL in a nutshell.
after doing some light research, it seems a dev drive is just a special file mount inside the linux abstraction layer.
You could have had some great points, but the fact that you use “microslop” unironically shows how much of a bias you have. Meaning your points might as well not exist.
You sound like an anti-vaxxer blaming everything wrong with their life on big pharma.
you could have argued against my great points but instead you fixated on a singular word that rustled your jimmies. Meaning your opinions are invalid.
I couldn’t understand most of what you said because of that sloppy microcock in your mouth.
ill argue. the last 5 years has saw significant inprovment for developers.
the dev drive
sudo
ssh
a fantastic terminal
wtf is a dev drive?
wsl what?
you mean putty?
wsl what??
WSL is inherently flawed because it isn’t fully integrated with the kernel. WSL is literally an abstraction layer of linux that sits on top of the existing windows device. it’s no better than cygwin. microslop developed a way to run VMs and mount the whole c drive inside it, that’s WSL in a nutshell.
after doing some light research, it seems a dev drive is just a special file mount inside the linux abstraction layer.
all I can say…
i didnt ment wsl once. everything i mentioned was pire windows.
in my defense, you’re pretty incoherent.
i made a short list of all the dev improvements. its not that hard to follow