• melfie@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      Is that Moonsanto’s patented corn that is genetically modified to grow in a vacuum? Maybe in the future, all the HFCS, hydrogenated soybean oil, etc. will be produced on the Moon, leaving Earth’s land for more suitable purposes like strip mining coal and data centers that manufacture AI slop.

    • prettybunnys@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Vermicompost is something you can readily make on the moon, meaning with this it proves you can take a resource available on the moon and grow in it.

      Big deal IMO.

      Well. “Proves” since it’s simulated regolith, not real regolith, and it was done on earth.

    • cadekat@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 days ago

      The article seems to imply the compost was added to both the plants with/without the fungi?

      Definitely cheating in the “can we grow plants?” department, but still useful information.

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      What would you propose, then?

      We use organic amendments all the time when reclaiming historically mined lands that did not salvage soils.

      Soils take millennia to form, and you’re not going to get fertile soils without either kickstarting the process or waiting.

      Another commentator points out that using arbuscular mychorrizhal fungi is also cheating. Again, how?

      To have a functional soil and not regolith you need the following:

      • An organic matter source - regolith lacks this
      • A moisture retaining media - regolith usually has this but its ability varies widely
      • Enough rooting depth for your desired plants
      • A method to transform organic matter to nutrients - regolith generally lacks this

      Organic matter is your pool of nutrients and microbes and fungi are what mineralize this pool into plant available forms, so saying they are cheating doesnt hold water (like a shitty regolith).

      But I can grow plants in glass beads! Sure you can, but you’re supplying chemical fertilizer to do it and constantly replacing that - so in this case you’re the organic matter pool and the transformation vector.

      @melfie@lemy.lol @cadekat@pawb.social

    • melfie@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      That’s nothing, I can grow plants in almost pure silica (i.e. a glass plant pot full of soil).

  • melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 days ago

    Lunar regolith is pretty nasty stuff that is sharp and sticks to everything. It’s pretty damaging to lungs, equipment, etc. I’d imagine using it as a raw material for cultivation would bring about some challenges.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I’ve also learned about it being sharp. What I haven’t heard answered is this. It’s sharp because there’s no weather to wear it down. If there were, how easily would it wear down? Does it crumble the second anything touches it? Being sharp and staying sharp are two different things. How much of a threat is this stuff, actually?

    • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      Sure, but the alternative is to stop destroying our own soils and respect our ecosystem, and humanity has proven it will take on any challenge except cleaning up after ourselves

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Look at a Saturn V. Look at a bag of chickpeas. If you think somehow launching a Saturn V (at a minimum) to get back a bag of chickpeas is somehow better for our ecosystem, I think I see why humanity is doomed.

        Space Nuttery is not the solution to anything.

        • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I was thinking this was future planning for the other direction. While actually having a permanent colony of civilians on the moon is unrealistic, having a layover/fueling station on the moon that will have a small population of researchers, engineers, etc. is actually pretty feasible, and any mass sent up there will still be expensive. Shipping seeds is significantly cheaper than shipping food, and dirt is heavy, so you want to ship as little of it as possible. If it’s possible to grow stuff in lunar soil, that drastically decreases the amount of mass that needs to be sent.

        • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          That’s exactly what I mean - we come up with all sorts of madness to grow food and obtain resources from further away. And society completely glosses over how impractical and wasteful it all is.

          Meanwhile, what we could use is treat our planet properly and succeed with the amazing gifts it already provides. We are the only species that seems hell bent on sh*tting where we eat, and we come up with these inefficient strategies all to avoid cleaning up after ourselves

          • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Oh, you’re right, I didn’t register your meaning, I get so upset whenever I see Space Nuttery I lose all civility.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s what you don’t get from this simulation.

      My uneducated guess is that 1/6th gravity would still be a great deal more like earth than 0 gravity.

    • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      Low and zero gravity can affect how roots spread/dig and later can cause issues with how water and nutrients circulate through the stalk since they evolved to circulate with Earth level gravity. Space station experiments have proven it’s not impossible, the plants can adapt, they’re just a bit different. Trees would probably struggle, most crops would be fine. What’s really difficult is pollination. You’d probably have to hand pollinate, set up a wind system in your greenhouse, or get self-pollinaters. Bees would struggle to adapt because low gravity would mess with their flight, their dance communication, and probably their honeycomb structure and larval development.

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    What capitalization rules are being applied in this headline? Seems like it’s out of The Art of the Style by Trump & White.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    FINALLY, I mean come on it is embarassing it took them this long, we were all waiting don’t tell me you weren’t.

  • PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    8 days ago

    Oh god, even in space there’s no escape from those bland awful little balls of mundanity. Surely it would be cheaper and less resource intensive for the astronauts to just roll up little balls of cardboard and eat them. The effect would be the same