Jeremy Scahill and Murtaza Hussain
Feb 18, 2026

A former senior U.S. intelligence official who is an informal advisor to the Trump administration on Middle East policy told Drop Site that, based on his discussions with current officials, he assesses an 80-90% likelihood of U.S. strikes within weeks.

Iran realizes that it is facing an unprecedented threat from the U.S. if a deal that conforms with Trump’s terms is not reached, former Pentagon official Jasmine El-Gamal told Drop Site. “This is not a dress rehearsal,” she said. “This is it. This is not the negotiations of last year or the year before or the year before that. They’re backed into a corner. There’s no off ramp.”

  • dizzle18@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is the likelihood of an invasion based on something Iran is doing? Or is it dependent on how horrifying the next Epstein file drop will be? I mean…I know the fucking answer to this already. Doesn’t make it any less infuriating. This piece of shit will start World War III, all to distract everyone from the fact that he raped children. “No new wars.”

    • CommieKhinkali@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      lets be real here, americans dont give a shit about epstein files. the info of the epstein class has been revealed that they eat and rape children and traffic them globally. i get that, if that is something theyre willing to release/leak, what theyre not showing the public must be at least 10x worse, but the americans basically havent done shit since finding out that almost every conspiracy is real lol. i think this is just a contention of usa to have full control over the world. i mean i dont know what to tell you when the opposition party is for going to war with iran, dems and reps align 99% on foreign policy. i just hope that iran wins this and survives to see another day.

    • ExistentialNightmare@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      What a dogshit liberal take, it’s primarily about keeping America the top dog through imperialism. Not saying the Epstein controversy has nothing all to do with this but Trump would still be doing similar warmongering even if the files had not been so damning to him and his circle.

    • mrdown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 day ago

      It is about controlling the straight of hormuz for the usa and to crush any resistance to the greater israel plan for Israel

      • CommieKhinkali@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        idk if they had or have nuclear weapons, but honestly they should get them asap. north korea hasnt been invaded only because they have nukes.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          They weren’t, weapons grade is 90, 60 is what is permitted by the NPT agreement, which is what they were enriching to.

          • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            Well I don’t really expect you to answer the question why they would be enriching to 60 anymore, but could you give a source on your claim that “this would be permitted by the NPT agreement”?

            My guess is that that’s a big fat lie

            Here the treaty in question to get you started

            edit: here’s the IAEA resolution explicitly stating that Iran was in breach of the NPT safeguards agreement. I’m really interested in your sources that refute this

            • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              That resolution refers to the requirements set by the 2019 agreement after the Trump unilaterally tore up the previous, multilateral agreement. America does not get to dictate what other states are allowed to do.

              • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                45 minutes ago

                Yeah but can you back up your claim that Iran was permitted 60% ‘under the NPT’?

                It seems you’re sidestepping because you’ve been caught in a lie

      • felixwhynot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Not that I support this action, but Don’t they have an enrichment facility with centrifuges?

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          They want nuclear energy, not weapons (though it’s pretty stupid for them, nukes are the only thing stopping US monster)

        • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          Just the fact that USA is comfortable attacking them means they don’t have nukes.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          They have nuclear power plants that require enriched uranium.

          If Iran wanted a nuclear bomb, instead of spending months trying to enrich Uranium beyond what’s required for power and medicine, they could simply chemically separate plutonium out from spent fuel.