With the level of police militarisation, I wouldn’t be so sure. If police murders a bunch of queer people, it’s still a pr disaster and so it’s something they want to avoid. But a bunch of queer people with guns in one place is called a compound or even possibly headquarters and they’re allowed to deploy tanks and flamebombs against it.
In the escalatory war wins the side that is legally allowed to own tanks and deploy flamethrowing robots. Every time.
Uh, Afghanistan, PKK on the Syrian/Turkish border, Myanmar, Tibet, etc all beg to differ. Let alone the older historical conflicts the US Military have lost.
As smaller less equipped forces making it untenable for a larger opposing force to maintain occupation? Absolutely. But I wouldn’t expect someone to reply in such a snarky manner to argue in good faith.
With the level of police militarisation, I wouldn’t be so sure. If police murders a bunch of queer people, it’s still a pr disaster and so it’s something they want to avoid. But a bunch of queer people with guns in one place is called a compound or even possibly headquarters and they’re allowed to deploy tanks and flamebombs against it.
In the escalatory war wins the side that is legally allowed to own tanks and deploy flamethrowing robots. Every time.
A responsive community watch is what’s needed, sadly i know personally how much people’s bystander effect kicks in if you’re not in their tribe.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_guerrilla_movements
Uh, Afghanistan, PKK on the Syrian/Turkish border, Myanmar, Tibet, etc all beg to differ. Let alone the older historical conflicts the US Military have lost.
Less Doom more Boom plz
You see Afghanistan and Kurdistan as successful examples? Damn, you’re deeply unserious person
As smaller less equipped forces making it untenable for a larger opposing force to maintain occupation? Absolutely. But I wouldn’t expect someone to reply in such a snarky manner to argue in good faith.