If at some point the US will care abou laws and constitution again, the published evidence will be enough to put all those pedos into megajail forever. As it stands, nothing will. They could publish a livefeed of Trump raping and eating children, and nothing will happen to him, and he wouldn’t lose a single supporter over it. Honestly, I don’t know why do they even bother with all this

Also Uzbekistan and Namibia. There is also a list of countries with way smaller production numbers, like Russia, China, US, India, etc, but they’re all collectively produce around 10% and sell less of that

I bet they’re gone already, redacted, shreded, destroyed. Why would they keep them if they can just destroy them

Getting mar-a-lago face and scamming gullible idiots via a crypto scam, name the more iconic duo. If it turns out she’s a pedo, she will be an ideal candidate for like a secretary of education or something.

Can’t remember, but it worked after I checked off the other ones without restarting.

If you only disable the first one, the points in menu are still there, so I don’t know what exactly does it do but not that. At least it was like that last time I tried to get rid of this annoying shit.

Oh wow, never knew that. This is some proper bullshit

significantly reduced quality

Is it that significant?

The whole region is unbelievable fucked. It will take decades to restore after Russia fucks off. And if it doesn’t fuck off, it will be dead forever

Damn, I kinda missed when Democrats get back power, last tims I checked they held minority in all the branches

Yep, that’s about what I expected

You wouldn’t know what a proper analogy is even if it smacks you in the face

When your country is corrupt enough so you can just put a fake charge on a person and make it stick, you’re done already, rules don’t matter. This rule only relevant in cases when judiciary system actually works and works independently of current leader.
This rule will help those who follow the rules, and don’t stop those who don’t, so overall it’s a good rule.

I feel like I’m taking crazy pills. Do you know where the US is?

Read better, said a person who’s media comprehension is so poor, they can’t read past their butthurt

Invalidating other people’s experiences is also something that is expected in this conversation.

Have you…seen the map of the world?

draws this behaviour as something universal you can just expect

Not universal, ubiquitous enough that you can fear it and expect it. This inability of understanding the difference between “all” and “a lot” is quite common both in general, and especially in this scenario. Especially prevalent in the form of “well, I’m not like that, therefore people like that are exceptionally rare”, regardless even of the correctness of this statement.
Let’s demonstrate this on an example that will not trigger your innate misogyny:
I live in a country where trains are notoriously unreliable. I come to a station, and my train is late. I write a post “damn, my train is late again, just as I expected”. You come to this post, and say “You’re stupid because not all trains are late, and by the way my trains are always on time, so you’re lying actually, and also it’s your fault because sometimes people miss their trains”.

Now they have to fight to be there

If you read my comment carefully, you would see that my point was: there is no advantage in doing so.

“A priest and a rabbi walks into a bar…”
“The joke is stupid because it gives a generalization that all the priest and rabbis are always walking into bars” - you, the intellectual.