She has been arguing that, as a Christian, she should not have to follow state rules about judicial impartiality.

A Texas judge is asking a federal court to overturn marriage equality in the U.S., arguing in a lawsuit filed on Friday that marriage for same-sex couples is unconstitutional because it was legalized in a decision that “subordinat[ed] state law to the policy preferences of unelected judges.”

The case involves Judge Dianne Hensley of Waco, Texas, who has been involved in years of legal proceedings to try to win the right to not perform marriages for same-sex couples while still performing them for opposite-sex couples. She claims that, as a Christian, she should not have to follow state judicial ethics rules about impartiality.

  • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’m not entirely sure other Christians are capable of impartiality considering the long long history of Christians getting special treatment in our judicial system. You don’t have to scratch the surface very hard to find a plethora of disgusting rulings that mentioned Christianity as a mitigating circumstance which allowed for lessened penalties.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah. I know Christians who can, but many can’t. Like, how many Christians really understand that the justification to deny Alaskan native sovereignty was that they weren’t Christians? I hold anti Christian sentiments, I’ve seen how they’ve oppressed everyone around them and cried foul at the sort of inconvenience they’d demand other religions experience.

    • YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Oh, don’t get me wrong, the establishment of Christianity in the US is horribly corrupt. I suppose I’m arguing to judge these pieces of shit by their character, not their religion. I’m not even Christian, I just believe it’s dangerous to start applying mass generalizations to any group of people. Religion has no place in justice, either in protecting or hurting someone’s case.

      • Triumph@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Religious belief is a choice. There’s no problem criticizing people for their choices.

    • MOARbid1@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      At this point, I don’t trust anyone that is religious. It has been proven time and again that they will act in the interest of their god, over the interest of humanity.