• rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not to say that netfix isn’t horrible, but how much did Netflix save in CO2 buy gutting the movie theater and video rental industry? Surely it’s better to stream than it is to drive to a physical location, pick up a crystalized block of oil, drive it home and shove it into our VCR.

    Hell, when they were doing disc delivery, it was coming through the mail who was already driving through the hood in most places.

    Hell, I wonder how much co2 it cost to make the DVD/VHS tapes in the first place.

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah this smacks of “but wind turbine blades aren’t recyclable”! So? It’s still better than what we were doing before.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        wind turbine blades aren’t recyclable

        I didn’t even know about that.

        Wonder if they could crush them up and use them as concrete aggregate.

        • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          “made mainly of carbon fiber, fiberglass, and balsa wood” from some random source. Doesn’t sound like anything particularly toxic or difficult to source. I can’t imagine putting them in landfill is a serious problem. So my response is “so what”.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Why not?

            Carbon fiber and fiberglass in concrete foundations would limit microplastics and add strength to the product. Throwing a never-decomposing product into a landfill is just taking up space for something that can decompose over a couple of hundred years. Reuse it at least once it there’s a viable solution.

            • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              Sure. I mean, you could. Probably there are better sources, like construction waste, that you’d want to exhaust first, but I obviously haven’t done a serious cost-benefit analysis, nor am I really qualified. My intuition is that you could do it but there are better uses of the time and money.

              Relatively inert stuff in a landfill doesn’t seem like the highest-priority use of the time and money. The resources used to scrap and recycle a wind turbine blade could probably be much better used for more consequential purposes.

              • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                I don’t like the idea of crushed fiberglass in landfills, but it’s far down the list of awful things we do to the planet. I think you’re correct in assuming the effort is better spent elsewhere.