• LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I’m way too old to be a Millennial, so I obviously can’t directly sympathize, but the ridiculous prices today really trigger the introvert side of me. I have this strong desire to move somewhere that land is still very cheap and become a crazy hermit who lives in a shed or something.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      15 hours ago

      So long as there’s gigabit internet and a hospital not too far away…

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Have home in the boonies, have gigabit fiber, have hospital <40min away if you’re not flooring it.

        Am also millennial… I guess we’re the lucky ones, closing on a home like 6months before covid closed everything down, and politicians made some irresponsible decisions that made the housing market skyrocket.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I have this strong desire to move somewhere that land is still very cheap and become a crazy hermit who lives in a shed or something.

      Any time I have a piece of this feeling I’m reminded of the most underappreciated technological and society development: the flush toilet.

      Its freakin’ magic that usually requires a functioning municipality to run dependably and cheaply. I just don’t think I can live a life long term without it.

      • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m building a new building with a washroom and putting in a waterless toilet by choice. Flushing shit is kind of primitive if you ask me, a waste instead of resource, if you excuse the pun.

        Not always possible in urban settings.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I agree you can have flush toilets without municipal water or sewage, but therea septic tank solution that subtract from the “easy” part I was referring to with the municipal sewage solution.

          With municipal sewage I’ve never had to change a failing septic tank macerator or worry about a impacts to the leech field. This says nothing about the regular pumping needed to maintain a septic tank.

          • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            I’ve never had to get my septic cleaned or serviced in over twenty years. Flush an enzyme pack every three months, it’ll never build up to needing flushed unless required when selling one day. I’ve had to replace a well pump once, really easy one day job. I’m sure municipal water and sewage is nice but I’ve never had either, pushing fifty years old. I never realized anyone considered these things difficult or complicated, I’m an idiot and have never ran into anything I couldn’t service myself.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        17 hours ago

        A septic system isn’t that expensive nor hard to maintain. If you have access to well water you can run it near independently. Assuming electricity of course, which is often available even in places without sewer or water.

        All you need is to occasionally pay someone to come and pump the tank

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          A septic system isn’t that expensive nor hard to maintain.

          OPs scenario is paraphrased as “shack out in the woods removed from civilization”. Getting the equipment and workers out to such a place would present the first challenge.

          If you have access to well water you can run it near independently. Assuming electricity of course, which is often available even in places without sewer or water.

          See, now we’ve raised the bar to not only requiring a sewage solution, but also dependable electricity and water source. This is why a functioning society is so valuable. It can provide easy and cheap access to dependable water, sewage, electricity, and skilled workers to build, install, and maintain the systems that let the toilet function without a second though.

          All you need is to occasionally pay someone to come and pump the tank

          See point #1.

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            I’ve seen people way out there be able to run septic systems. We’re talking miles of dirt road through the mountains

            Also have you even traveled the rural US? You can usually get electricity in the middle of absolutely no where. Thank FDR for that one.

            Basically it’s perfectly possible to meet the shack in the woods definition in either of our models. You can find a place without access to these things in a rural setting, but you also can.

      • oftenawake@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Give me a compost toilet any day! A peaceful poo, often with a view. No mixing water with shit and then needing to separate them again. Why make more work out of nothing!? A well kept compost toilet is heavenly. Plus zero splashback - can’t fault that. Keep water free of sewage!

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        toilets just require a water supply and somewhere to flush to

        no need for municipal water supply and wastewater, though that does make it easy, but you can simply use stream water that gravity fills your well located water tanks, then flush into a septic container suitable for the location. or hell even hand pump the water up from a well - bicycles make great transmissions to drive pumps

          • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            and anecdotally my experience and that of pretty much everybody I knew growing up says otherwise lol

            • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I think you’re proving my point. Geography can change the experience significantly. This could be because local agricultural producers also use wells for irrigation running a residence’s dry (without drilling deeper), or the climate being more brutal on well pumps and pressure tanks. Quality of the water that comes out may vary drastically with pollution or runoff requiring more frequent home testing or treatment.

              I’m not saying well water is impossible to live on, I’m pointing out that its a bunch of work and doesn’t just “happen” like turning the tap on using municipal water.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Well it’s telling that all of the rich investment banker types always eventually quit and start a hobby farm in the country.

      The general feeling seems to be that agriculture was a good idea, but we took things too far with this whole civilisation thing.

      • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You remind me of this Hitchhiker’s quote:

        In the beginning the Universe was created. This had made many people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.

      • ILoveUnions@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Nah screw that. The issue is not enough cities, and the solution is certainly not further unsustainable sprawl

          • toddestan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I suppose it depends a bit. Most of the people who want a hobby farm also want the amenities that big cities offer, so the hobby farms tend to be at the edges of the outer-ring suburbs which could be considered sprawl. There’s also working farms in those sorts of areas, but I’d not call that sprawl since those farms are using the land productively and in most cases were there long before the suburbs started encroaching on them.

            A rural hobby farm out in the middle of nowhere I’d be less inclined to call sprawl.

          • ILoveUnions@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            A hobby farm is absolutely sprawl. I’m not going to go out here and say every farm is sprawl;but if your farm is just for hobby? Yeah absolutely. Though to be fair it really does depend on yields…

        • Aljernon@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Moving onto abandoned agricultural land doesn’t count as sprawl if you don’t subdivide it and start growing food.

    • affenlehrer@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      A bit inland in Dalmatia (Croatia) seems very cheap and you could have at least have your own wine and olives. Land directly at the coast is super expensive.