• venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    22 hours ago

    If one country has nukes, all countries should have nukes. It’s only fair.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      No country should have nukes, and more countries acquiring them makes that goal even harder to achieve.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        If some countries have nukes, probability of nuclear attack is high

        As more countries have nukes, probability of nuclear attack drops significantly

        It’s impossible to have zero countries with nukes anymore, someone will always have secret nukes, which leads to high risk

          • xenomor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            This exactly. The most significant result of hoisting up nonproliferation as a virtue has been to sustain and grow US hegemony. That is a bad deal for everyone, including Americans.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          As more countries have nukes, the chance goes up. More leaders have the opportunity to pull the trigger. It only takes one crazy guy taking power. Or one nuke left improperly secured, especially in an unstable country, and then it gets stolen and used, even as a dirty bomb.

      • venusaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Yeah but who’s gonna stop them? I know that’s the right answer for a pageant contestant, but be realistic.