• wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Do you know that the aircraft need servicing after every flight, otherwise it’s grounded, and that supplies would come from the country of origin? US for F35. Sweden for Grippen.

    Does that change your outlook?

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It’s not about money. It’s about which country you trust to keep supplying you and not use your dependency to control how and when you use your planes.

    • Eiri@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I guess, but I still wouldn’t feel qualified enough to offer a confident answer. There are lots of factors.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        So in Europe there was a desire to send F35s into conflict in Ukraine. US said no by saying that servicing supplies would not be made available.

        Sovereign nations are unable to use their planes how they want to.

        Now with Gripen it might be a similar situation, but Sweden has been trustworthy thus far.