fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoJudge hands Lambo.com to Lamborghini after ruling owner acted in bad faithwww.techradar.comexternal-linkmessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1266arrow-down14
arrow-up1262arrow-down1external-linkJudge hands Lambo.com to Lamborghini after ruling owner acted in bad faithwww.techradar.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square87fedilink
minus-squarew3dd1e@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37·1 day agoI don’t have all the details to the case, but after reading the article I kinda think they got it wrong. Let that man call himself Lambo and keep the domain. As long as he isn’t pretending to represent another brand, such as Lamborghini.
minus-squareNauticalNoodle@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-25 minutes agoI agree with you, but they also don’t elaborate and go into detail regarding the precedents/regulations used to make this ruling. I’m willing to admit that there may be more to the story. OTOH, If buying isn’t owning, then…?
minus-squareethnss@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·11 hours agoThey got it right because they sided with the wealthy corporation.
I don’t have all the details to the case, but after reading the article I kinda think they got it wrong.
Let that man call himself Lambo and keep the domain. As long as he isn’t pretending to represent another brand, such as Lamborghini.
I agree with you, but they also don’t elaborate and go into detail regarding the precedents/regulations used to make this ruling. I’m willing to admit that there may be more to the story.
OTOH, If buying isn’t owning, then…?
They got it right because they sided with the wealthy corporation.