It’s a server with integrated UPS and KVM console.

This one is well matured, barrel aged with hints and aromas beyond my palette.
A rare meme in these times, to be sure.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/comical-ali-baghdad-bob

The value after the : isn’t in double/single quotes, so it is a literal value. Thus, a float value will be parsed as a float. Whether it is 1E-5 or 0.00001. They are numerically equivalent, but not stringly equivalent.

If you are having errors parsing your JSON, then use a proper JSON library instead of trying to roll your own.

But that’s a stringify method, tho.
JS passes a float to the console. Console prints the float however it wants to.

Just do strict comparison when you want to compare a variable to1e-5.
Cause a string of 0.00001 should be passed through parseFloat (or whatever your language equivalent is) before you compare it to a variable with the value f0.00001

No, from the UK.
I don’t understand how the US can want to have 100% paper ballots, but ban voting booths (which to me means, in person voting). This essentially leaves postal voting.
And USPS has been repeatedly targeted by right wing politics.

What kind of paper voting system is left without in-person, if USPS is compromised?

President Donald Trump on Friday [21st Feb 2025, I think] said he may put the U.S. Postal Service under the control of the Commerce Department in what would be an executive branch takeover of the agency, which has operated as an independent entity since 1970. https://apnews.com/article/trump-postal-service-usps-what-to-know-672db6c590837411ca3ba36966e374e1

So paper votes only, no voting booths… Leave postal votes. And the government controls the postal service.
What else is there?

If the postal service isn’t a political target, then post voting is excellent.
Ballots can be mailed weeks in advance, they can be collected by a deadline, they can then be counted.
But we’ve seen Americas right wing go after USPS, so - quite frankly - I don’t see any way it is as fool-proof as in-person voting.
Voting day needs to be a holiday, or employers need to give PTO for voting.

None of which will happen.
Voting booths will be banned.
USPS will be compromised/defunded to the point it can’t carry out it’s duties.
Only the people that can schedule the time with Electoral College personnel will be able to actually register a vote.

You know, I have no idea.
I think it depends on the linked-to servers.
If the server thinks the Lemmy thumbnail/summary generator is a bad bot, it will not return a thumbnail. If it’s actually a decent web server, I think the Lenny instance will generate & distribute a thumbnail automatically and attach a summary.
I presume this is handled by the posts hosting instance.

I’ve noticed some sites that get linked to don’t have a thumbnail and some sort of “prove you aren’t a bit” subtext/caption.
And others work fine

I don’t think ships have any collision avoidance systems, like aircrafts do.
And I don’t think ships are actively monitored and instructed, like aircrafts are.

Seems hard to believe that a ship travelling at 16 knots was unable to avoid a stationary ship.
However, further down the BBC post, there is an image of all the ships in the area at the time of the collision.
If it’s busy, I’d imagine the crew were alert. Equally, they might have been concentrating on something else.
They had also just left port, so perhaps there was a change of shift/watch.

There are a lot of laws regarding maritime navigation to avoid collision.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Regulations_for_Preventing_Collisions_at_Sea
Perhaps the cargo ship did not realise the tanker was anchored, and assumed they would move out of the way.

Ultimately, everything is too recent to be able to understand what happened.

Edit:
Link to the post with the image of traffic at the time:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cgq1pwjlqq2t?post=asset%3A6555b096-7f65-4270-9768-53eaae9531b4#post

Lemmy.ml is the instance run by the developers. Pretty sure there are some discussions there.
Other than that, GitHub issues. I’m surprised they haven’t enabled GitHub discussions.