I get the intel lower power when not doing stuff (wish amd had high/low config for cores too) but what I mean was, in laptop cpus that are not on battery (just connected to power) does amd do more with the same power usage?

if the comparation can not be done with the same gen cpus from two companies, then maybe a similar power usage cpu from amd and one from intel (laptop of course), do they for example have similar geekbench benchmark results? (for lack of better tool)

so what I am asking is I dont care that is the same gen amd and intel laptop cpu with both connected to socket power, if amd is better. I want to know if for the same power usage (not idling but working) amd is better or not.

care to explain a bit more?

care to explain that last part?

for example if I want to by a new laptop right now, do I buy intel? because it has better power usage? is that only idle and/or lower usage power? what about if I just plus the laptop to power socket always (like a simple desktop), then amd is better with respect to performance per watt?

welcome to western world.

maybe that was the remastering process issues. also maybe 4k movies are not actually 4ks and are AI upscalers from actual 2k masters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxOqWYytypg

science and medicine mostly prolong life or save lives. they can (in a very limited manner) help somewhat with tiredness at old age. healthy brain function is not improved that much with the help of health industry.

and we need those who their thinking is not fossilized. I don’t mean that as insult, it is just they way of life.

as I said they can of course be advisers.

are you saying most 110 years old are capable of holding highest offices? like house of representatives? they need to move alot and talk to alot of people. it is very tiring.

if not at 110 then at some age most of us are not really gonna be great at those “jobs”.

and another side to my point is that old people are gonna set in their politics and also is they survive the politics circus (many many terms) then they become like a family so they are not gonna rock the boat, so they usually become THE status quo. look at Bernie and his support for jewish isis.

also they are not really good at fixing new problems (or even old ones) with new tools.

yes but the public office, specially the manager, need working brain that can tackle new ideas. I think 80 is too high. I think 70 is too high. maybe set it as the age of retirement.

they can still be as advisors though.

bernie has been a pressure valve for USA political system.

I am not American but I don’t think any significant move has been done by him except support for unions. and with respect to Palestine vs Jewish ISIS, Bernie has been a Biden copy.

In my opinion there should be an age limit for public office. I think 70 should be the max. I my even go to 65.

wow. how can jewish ISIS recover from this blow.

/////sssss

My post was not supposed to be that TikTok specifically is bad.

my point was every platform (that uses attention as money generator) would eventually be some kind of short videos which emulates pov of user (vertical interface instead of TV horizontal interface) that encourage “engagements”

every platform becomes TikTok at the end.

I am not saying the government is a saint. I am saying a lot of this is propaganda.

I saw a “dissident” that got death penalty and its supporters would show a picture of her just sitting beside fire and saying she was just a “social worker” then later the original picture with her holding a rifle and pictures of her training with terrorist groups came out.

the ironic part is one of the woman u named “Pakhshan Azizi” was/is hailed as “Kurdish-Iranian human rights activist”. you can even just search her name but you have to do it in english and see a sea of website bemoaining a “human rights activist”. with these picture:

but if you search her name in persian “پخشان عزیزی” you get these pictures too:

she is a member of terrorist group “پژآک”

I don’t need to love my goverment to see when most of those who say “human rights in Iran” are funded by who.

if any one these people did one tenth of the stuff they did iran, in eu or uk or usa, they would not even get to a court. they would be gunned down.

I am against alot of dress code law or marriage laws in my country but the judiciary is in my opinion too soft on terrorist supporters in iran.

Another example: the right side is a post from “iran internatinal” that is a propaganda network that was funded by saudies but then bought out by jweish isis (israel). the left side is the original picture.

so for example in 2022 49% for murder. this is death penalty for murder. which most countries used to have (and many still do). and in Iran (and maybe other muslim countries) there is the ghasas, which is death penalty for murder that the family of victim that request. it is not for other killing, like if you kill someone in an accident (car accident).

44% for dug crimes. it means drug smuggler (not user) which unfortunately because of Iran neighboring Afghanistan (a major drug producer) there are a lot of them.

this pressure on Iran for because of “Muh human rights” for death penalty is mostly using this number to say Iranian government is killing dissidents, which in my opinion is mostly bullshit.

this pressure even made many ordinary Iranians mad because the drug destination is mostly for EU and many Iranian border guards and police die in clashes with drug smugglers. this anger was to an extent that there was a call for government that next time EU harrased about this death penalties, Iran should just open its border and let the drug flow to EU.

This may blow your mind but there’s other countries than the US. It’s crazy that I have to point this out on a post about Iran no less.

I didn’t mean you are american. I was making a point about level of history knowledge (fox news level)

No, OP is misinformed.

I shoudl have been more clear that I meant that those post started as propaganda to whitewash pahlavi regime. but yes, OP is misinformed and just repeat those porpaganda post unknowingly.

. The only (inept) propagandist here is you.

I have no idea what you mean by that. I am trying to do what exactly? what is the propaganda part I am saying?

you are mostly right. that is one of my flaws.

the point OP is trying to make or the implied overall picture the overthrow of mossadegh was before overthrow of pahlavi. it is not irrelevant.

OP point is retarded. they show women in miniskirt and then say wow before 1979 women where so “free”.

if you see syria and watch the propaganda and then literal theorists( recognized by the west too) there whitewashed by the west to get a tyrannical but subservient to west goverment there that can beat women and ban all alcohol and all those “freedoms” that had under bashar and you still think this retarded post are not propaganda I have no furthur point to make to you.

go watch fox news. it is better for you.

if it was not clear enough, let me say it: the OP post is retarded propaganda. and Israel level of propaganda at that.

have a nice day.

Maybe give Mossadegh more than a sentence in a wall of text next time?

I thought I was proving a point that mossadegh was before that sham parliment so your point about him rubber stamping order was meaningless.

now I see that I was not respectful enough when speaking about him and I should have written a poem about him, maybe?

if you don’t even know the order of historical events that happened , then please don’t insult me about my “reading comprehension”.

have a nice day. I am done replying to these kind of posts.

Mosaddegh just rubber stamped whatever the Shah wanted in your opinion?

wow. a history buff you are not.

mosadegh came to power as a prime minister after mashroote (conditional and limited king) ,he nationalized the iranian oil and UK got but hurt so they asked CIA to overthrow him in a Coup d’état.

btw that was the first time in history of the CIA terrorist org that they did regime change.

after that even a little independent parliament was not tolerated by shah and it was complete sham after it. he became a complete tyrant and created one of the worst dictatorships ever.

I was gonna say that the current goverment is not even close to that level but that would be an insult to the islamis republic (even with its retardedness). even saudi dictatorship is heaven compared to shah.

you can read the books that shah’s own men wrote about this after the ran outside of iran.

please be more informed in the basic of an issue and not be fox news level “expert”

I am one of those that are for death penalty for some crimes.

most of what of the list you provided are not official. some of them are true and I agree with them and some of them are true and I disagree with them.

absolute majority of the death penalty in iran is for drug smuggling (not using).

when USA invaded afganistan the heroine trade boomed and wrecked a lot of families in Iran.

so the penalty is justified in the eyes of most iranians.