

In my country, jury duty can be refused and is deemed as a role, not an obligation. It is an honor, as it is very rare to have such added role in court; takes very complex and often serious crimes. People called for it often accept but I have heard of situations where people object from personal or moral values.
And, again, in my country, voting is not an obligation, nor legal, nor moral. It is a right and the duty to vote is considered a matter of respect towards the right that was acquired through a revolution and the individual right to be part of the political destiny of the nation, no matter how small.
Maybe I’m splitting hairs, here, but I don’t care.
A duty arises from a personal sense of necessity to do something. Call moral obligation if it is easier for you. Being moral relative… Obligation is determined, enforced and enforceable by law.







I’m not german but how about a big “no” for that genious suggestion?
This type of idea puts me in such a state of mind I don’t even have the energy to curse.
Listen to science. Actually listen to experts and learn that people produce more and better in shorter work days. Want more work hire more workers, plan activities better and automatize repetitive, predictable, tasks.
Politians work for the people. The people owe them nothing. Stop trying to force socities back.