julian

m_f@discuss.online not directly, but there was a session at FediForum on Thursday that discussed the website and next steps for updating it. It’s been stagnant for quite awhile but evan@cosocial.ca and j12t@j12t.social finally have write access to the repo and control of the domain.

blazeknave@lemmy.world

beep beep boop boop boop boop beep… EEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeee awwwwwww ka-dong ka-dong da kshhhhhhhhhhhhhhHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

eerie silence

you can still have it with NodeBB!

Hey deadsuperhero@lemmy.world have you tried updating to the latest NodeBB? You can post to Lemmy communities from there too!

m_f@discuss.online ActivityPub.rocks I bet?

There’s exciting work planned for updating this site!

PewDiePie built his fame and fortune on a centralized platform.

I am not certain whether he will see the benefit of a decentralized future beyond dollar signs.

Happy to be proven wrong.

pineapplelover@lemm.ee you can only access by entering a semantically correct invocation of tar as run on a POSIX box from 1978.

I would say that Pixelfed is closer to the microblog space than it is the threaded discussion space.

It’s essentially microblogging except with an image media focus (or video, in the case of Loops.)

To each their own, some people communicate better using pictures, some better over short text, some better over long-form text. There’s a space for them all :smile:

melroy@kbin.melroy.org oh sorry to hear that :frowning: hopefully Dan hasn’t moved on from FediDB already.

melroy@kbin.melroy.org I think you have to open a PR to their repo to get it updated?

@iso@lemy.lol what’s a “lemmy-like” PM :laughing: I think this explains why I can’t log into the site.

I think the FEP process is overly complicated for what it is, but it’s definitely helpful if you have multiple implementors on board.

The easiest (but least accessible) solution is to document something on your own site, but that lacks the social proof that a finalized FEP has.

Just some food for thought 🙂 I’m looking to create an FEP for cross posting and would love to get the entire threadiverse dev community involved.

@rimu@piefed.social interesting, how does this differ from tags?

Edit: I see the other post you made. I’m interested in this but hoping you’ll write up an FEP for this so it is more easily implemented by others.

@melroy@kbin.melroy.org NodeBB here, agreed.

It really is the most succinct nickname to describe the type of software we are… and I feel that outweighs possible association with Threads.

Let’s clarify something here. Mastodon follower only posts don’t have the “public pseudo user” addressed, do they?

That’s the important piece that this whole thing hinges upon

If it is present, Mastodon is a fault. If not, Pixelfed messed up.

Am I mistaken?

For example, a followers-only post is addressed to the followers collection of the author, at minimum. When NodeBB sees this, it doesn’t even consider it public, because the public pseudo user isn’t addressed. We also have no concept of “followers only”, but we handle them just fine.