Specifically USAID classified files? I ask because I worked with a different segment of the US government during the Obama years and we sure as shit didn’t have everything digitized.

It’s like a weighted blanket for your head! So calming.

Awesome! I’m glad you got it to work (sorry I dropped off the earth–i forgot I have a commute)

I don’t know of a plugin that does that, but if you like I can write you a how-to on how to do it in a desktop browser. It’s not wicked complicated. Ping me if no one has a better suggestion–if you tell me the website, I can even tailor the walkthrough to that website.

You could also type your text out in notepad, then copy and paste that into the web text box.

I care! I was one of the 3 trans people in the fencing club and I really dislike being told there are so few “trans college athletes” that I was about 10% of the total (assuming the prevalence of trans college athletes has remained constant from 15 years ago to today).

I don’t find it useful to quote statistics without recognizing their sources and limitations. It leads to inaccurate perceptions of reality.

From https://www.kget.com/sports/ncaa-president-says-there-are-less-than-10-transgender-athletes-in-college-sports/ ? That’s the number the head of the NCAA is aware of, and almost certainly doesn’t cover college athletes playing on non-NCAA teams and sports.

It was a club sport and counted as a PE class for college credit. I get that the NCAA doesn’t cover clubs, but the image and parent comment didn’t specify NCAA sanctioned sports.

And dog poo bags, around here. And hopefully there’s a trash bin near the trailhead.

What they said

I’d be shocked if there’s only 10 trans college athletes. My college fencing club had three I could name, 15 years ago. My current college has at least one.

Now, out trans women who competed in NCAA sports, certainly a smaller set of people.

Also, totes agree it’s ridiculous to care about (I don’t know how to call it) the “integrity” of college women’s sports more than something that is actually harming and killing kids.

It’s funny because Chinese snake oil (made from Chinese water snakes) may have actually been effective for aches and soreness due to its high omega-3 content. Then, American charlatans got ahold of the “snake oil” idea and made it with “alternative” ingredients (mineral oil, maybe rattlesnake if you’re lucky) that did not convey the same benefits.

Oh yeah, I get that there’s more than 2 reasons to be upset about AI scraping. I work in the academic library world and the vibe here is

1. bots are rude
2. AI is not a reliable source of facts

We work with facts and information, and I have no expectation that my collection of facts is something to defend against replication.

On the other hand, I’d be pissed AF if someone stole my research paper on 1800s family drama and reprinted it without attribution, or AI-hallucinated new pseudo-facts that were not in the source materials.

Edit: my situation isn’t that of others and I totally get why artists and authors would be upset about AI bots stealing their work.

I use a shelf-stable egg replacer in my baking, mostly because I hardly ever have eggs on hand. (Bob’s Red Mill is the brand I see, but I’m sure there’s other brands out there)

I guess I’m big on shelf-stable substitutes for stuff that goes bad fast: I also have powdered milk for baking/sauces, and textured vegetable protein to add protein and texture to things I’d usually use ground meat for, where the meat’s flavor would be overpowered by the sauce anyway.

Tbh, I’d be less testy about bots scraping my sites for AI input IF they respected my robots.txt file and didn’t slam the server. They’re just rude and I don’t like it. Sometimes they’re so rude it’s effectively a DOS attack.

Tbh, my sites exist to get information out there and I don’t care if someone mirrors my sites, as long as the information is still accurate.

Class schedule and track meetups?