Oh oof haha thnx, fixed

Or China, or Cuba, or a global south country or or or…the list could go on 4ever haha 😂

Re-commenting what @freagle@lemmygrad.ml commented so you can see it since .world seems to love censoring non-liberal instances

You should study North Korean politics and political structures.

The standard you are using, which is that there should be constant changes in leadership, is an attempt to use your existing liberal democracy as the only possible model for liberatory politics.

Think about it. Is the ONLY way you would ever accept a political system when it has constant leadership churn? Ok, grant that. Then ask, what causes constant leadership churn?

The answers will be either constant fighting between major ideologically opposed factions OR constant disapproval by the people being governed.

Neither of those conditions are good healthy conditions.

Now instead imagine if there were no competing ideologies, the capitalists have been purged and domestically the entire population has a shares collective trauma from the massive bombing campaign by the psychopathic US.

What’s the behavior gonna be? Well, if any leader is capable of leading them out of the caves and to safety from napalm, kidnapping, fire bombing, and famine - that leader is either very lucky and when their luck runs out they will be ousted, or that leader is actually very effective, responsive to the needs of the people, and is capable of adapting to changing times. In that case, the people will have absolutely no desire to put another leader in place.

When that happens, especially in a culture that puts huge importance on multi-generational families, the children of that leader are likely going to be the best equipped to carry in the program. Not necessarily though. They would have to remain constantly engaged, constantly proving that they are capable.

What would that require? It would require a system where by existing leadership cabinets were capable of selecting and assigning those descendants to specific posts. And guess what… That’s exactly what DPRK has.

Your insistence that freedom is defined exclusively by multi-party systems that give “equal” voice to capitalist and working class interests is a form of chauvinism.

I got u fam lol

According to whom? The firewall of western media known to despise and slander communism at every turn?

Only western “media” labels RT as “propaganda” in order to discredit them because they refuse to stick to approved narratives

It’s a proxy war because the US overthrew the democratically elected Ukrainian gov in 2014 and installed their own russophobic puppet gov and has been pushing for Russia to get into a war since and finally succeeded when Russia had to defend itself against further NATO aggression/expansionism by the US

Ohh yea, “Just roll over for the US proxy war plz k thnx bye” 😆

as expected from a .world account haha

Another lib down!

Haha there it is again, the Wikipedia “source” that is somehow immune to pushing western narratives despite being part of the western propa machine 😂

This is a real news source, it might be jus a tad jarring if all ur used to is western “news” sources that love to discredit any sources that refuse to stick to approved western narratives

Oh no! Blocked by a .world lib, how will I ever live with myself 🤣

First ha yea “invading army” abso has nothing to do with trying to stop further NATO expansionism for the US or the fact that the US overthrew Ukraine’s legit elected gov in 2014 for a puppet gov. 2nd, western “news” outlets gets their narratives from the CIA or other US agencies

How shocking 😆

Haha yea, because western “media” is SO much more trustworthy 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Ur just parroting what western “media” wants you to. RT doesn’t cave to western narratives so the recourse for western “media” is to slander it as “propaganda”

The Dogntlet

A well debunked western propaganda? I remember the debunking ya!

haha! Yeah a wikipedia link! Im sure the content anybody can edit isn’t being controlled by Western narratives 😂