Careful stranger… that sounds a lot like nuance. And they don’t take kindly to nuance in these parts.

Not pictured: the ninety million elves, hobbits, dwarves, and men that felt that as long as a single life is lost in the process, all sides are identical and they can’t in good conscious support [issue] when [thing] is happening.

I mean… they’re going to do it anyway.

Either die a hero……

they did the responsible thing and stayed home, where they weren’t hurting anyone with their vote.

Yeah? How’s that decision working out for them do you think? Because from where I stand, they hurt even more people with their inability to do the absolute bare minimum it would have taken to potentially stop this from happening.

Goes to show how powerful entitlement is. Hopefully, there’s a next time and they’ll have a chance to use what they’ve learned from all the lives lost, and damages that they helped create over the next four years.

Crazy… one would think it would be illegal to use the presidency to push cars on people.

Soooo…. What exactly are surveillance planes doing to you personally?

That’ll work. I was thinking something like:

The Central Incelligence Agency.

The reason? It’s right there in the title:

Google.

Wait… there are people that didn’t know this was a thing? I get that the Non-Voting Party pretty much ignored the war crimes committed by Russia in favor of accusing everyone and their mother of supporting genocide in Palestine just to influence an election…

But that doesn’t mean they weren’t aware it was happening.

Who else exists that one might mistakenly think didn’t know this was going to happen? I’m genuinely curious as this seems to be created to generate anger and shock.

Is there anyone else out there that refuse to call them by that stupid fucking name? It’s like buying into a teenaged 4chan-dwelling edgelord’s sad joke.

It only fuels their dumb bullshit.

Naah, it’s not that. It’s that your argument bores me. Because it’s always the same thing- you build your straw man by editing everyone’s words to mean something they’re not at all saying, and then arrogantly pretend to have the upper hand whilst only achieving to prove the point of whoever you’re debating with. Frankly…

It’s getting old.

And If this conversation served any purpose, it was to show to anyone who happens to make it this far, that not only are your views on the subject very hypocritical, but that you’re also completely oblivious to it even when it is pointed out to you in plain sight.

To summarize:

According to you- age limits need to be placed on everyone but those that align with your ideology.

According to me- that’s some dangerous gatekeeping that is very reminiscent of someone else that is currently very popular today.

And having had the opportunity to interact with you here on several occasions, this seems to be a trend for you. Seemingly- the rules should apply only to others, but never you.

Again, this is very familiar behavior. I just can’t put my finger on who it reminds me of.

Now, go on and have your gotcha moment and bring up that I had said “we’re done here” in your obsessive need to have the last word. My experience with you has shown that there’s no possible outcome in which a conversation with you can end otherwise. And do be sure to accuse me of stalking you if I ever happen to respond to any comment you make within the next few days or so.

Yawn….

But Bernie is exempt right? Because he’s your guy? It’s always great when you people call yourselves out.

We’re done here.

Again, you really love telling others what they are saying, don’t you?

Here you are, ironically trying to catch me one of your gotcha fails while not even acknowledging the hypocrisy of your argument that’s blindly in favor of the original statement:

All democratic Representatives,

Since you clearly have difficulty understanding things others say before you get your chance to rewrite their words for your little straw men…

What I was implying- was that it must have meant that the age limit should be set for ONLY democratic representatives, yes?

Which then it seems to go without saying, based on your poor ability to see what the argument even is- that one is to assume that the suggested age limit wouldn’t apply to only those you consider to be in your ring. It was very kind of you to remove all doubt from what would have normally been a suspicion.

I don’t know… seems a bit hypocritical if you ask me. But I’m sure you’ll change everything I’ve said here to mean something entirely different.

Man you love telling others what they are saying, don’t you?

Your entire comment history is you editing the words of others. I wonder why that is……

ROFL!

I knew one of you would come along to move the goalposts.

So… Bernie Sanders is posturing and out of touch?

….said the 90 million people that stayed home in November.