Intentionally missing the point is not an argument in itself.

Slovenia was first 🙂, but I think they weren’t definitive about it. Probably they wanted to wait so they wouldn’t be the only one.

You think they could easily find out people who are using an app they can’t check? How?

I’ve not looked into this chat control thing (I did sign the thing opposing it, don’t worry), what’s it about? Specifically, how would they prevent me using a chat app they can’t look into?

It’s a stupid thing to go at anyway, chat. Its obvious people will hate it and organize against it. On the other actual pedos will find a way to encrypt it if they know someone could be watching. And on the other other hand they set so many guardrails, it would take a shitton of judges and signatures to actually go and look.

It would make way more sense to put more effort in other places. I think, but I don’t know a lot about hunting pedos.

That’s not what you are doing at all. You are not laughing. Anti ai people are outraged, full of hatred and ready to pounce on anyone who isn’t as anti as they are. It’s a super emotional issue, especially on fediverse.

You may be confident, because you probably don’t know how software is built. Nobody is going to just abandon all the experience they have, vibe code something and release whatever. Thats not how it works.

Yeah, what is antifascist ideology? Like, equal rights, being nice,… That kind of stuff?

And transgender ideology? What is that? To be nice to transgender people?

I think people today, after having a year experience with ai know it’s capabilities reasonably well. My mother is 73 and it’s been a while since she stopped joking about what ai wrote to her that was silly or wrong, so people using computers at their jobs should be much more aware.

I agree about that llms are good at some things. They are great tools for what they can do. Let’s use them for those things! I mean even programming has benefitted a lot from this, especially in education, junior level stuff, prototyping, …

When using any product, a certain responsibility falls on the user. You can’t blame technology for what stupid users do.

Ok? So, what you are saying is that some lawyers are idiots. I could have told you that before ai existed.

No not really, just an observation. It literally said you are a boring person. Not sure whats not to get.

Bye.

Yeah, but … they also can’t just do nothing and possibly miss out on something. Especially if they already invested a lot.

That makes no sense. That has nothing to do with it. What are you on about.

That’s like watching tv and not knowing how it works. You still know what to get out of it.

Sure. But you can literally test almost all frontier models for free. It’s not like there is some conspiracy or secret. Even my 73 year old mother uses it and knows it’s general limits.

You don’t have to know about tokens to see what ai can and cannot do.

They are using it for every question. It’s pointless. The only reason they are doing it is to blow up their numbers.

… they are trying to be infront. So that some future ai search wouldn’t capture their market share. It’s a safety thing even if it’s not working for all types of questions.

Removed by mod

I don’t want to defend ai again, but it’s a technology, it can do some things and can’t do others. By now this should be obvious to everyone. Except to the people that believe everything commercials tell them.

I find it bizarre that people find these obvious cases to prove the tech is worthless. Like saying cars are worthless because they can’t go under water.

Did he deserve to die? I don’t think it’s fair to say that. He was a bad person and had a lot of bad influence over way too many people.

But even if he was reprehensible, killing him will not do anyone any good. It will just be used for further radicalization. Not that they need any excuse.

I don’t. Ursula said this conflict is paramount for eu, they will have to respond with something.

It has to start somewhere.