

You really think people would go online and lie? Just because he posted it does not make it a real text. It does appear to be genuine though, but don’t just trust things cause someone said/posted it
You really think people would go online and lie? Just because he posted it does not make it a real text. It does appear to be genuine though, but don’t just trust things cause someone said/posted it
Well if they are just standing around and not actually shooting people they are still “participating” but aren’t doing anything wrong
I don’t agree with this practice of planned obsolescence, but aren’t cars already their own planned obsolescence? You have to keep giving it fuel, so in terms of the analogy, wouldn’t the company just stop selling fuel? You still have the parts, they just no longer function
Yes I’m aware that car manufacturers don’t sell the fuel, which causes a problem with my analogy, but I can’t see a perfect analogy for this case.
I agree wholeheartedly. Even if the state doesn’t allow for a retrial, her conviction should be removed. Like you said it only matters ethically
It absolutely should matter if she did the deed, as that makes her a murderer, but I will concede that if they used corrupt means to convict her it does invalidate the whole process.
There is a very fine balance to be struck here that I don’t think I can do justice.
Do you work in a field where 7*10-8 differences matter? Cause most fields I know don’t mind an error margin that small (granted I don’t know a lot)