This Earth, the only true home i ever had and will ever have, is not my world, i’m just a passerby in here … it is yours and it is strange.
Picture might be too big : there is a maximum number of kilobytes allowed.
it was already cross-posted in this community 2 hours before. Could you please delete this duplicate ?
Follow the cross-post at !nottheonion for more fun on this.
You might be right since i know close to nothing about Chinese Communist Party. Yet, i believe they would be secretive about exactly how much one and the other thing weighs in the balance for them.
i absolutely believe you that the technology of these old machines is much too complex and this is an argument why the Chinese have to make a better technology to replace it :
https://www.trendforce.com/news/2025/03/10/news-chinas-homegrown-euv-machines-rumored-for-q3-trial-production-spelling-trouble-for-asml/
(…) Unlike ASML’s LPP (laser-produced plasma) method, which relies on high-energy lasers and complex FPGA-based controls, the report indicates that China’s LDP (laser-induced discharge plasma) offers a simpler design, smaller footprint, better energy efficiency, and potentially lower production costs.
(…) set for trial production for the third quarter, 2025, with mass manufacturing aimed for 2026.
🤣, welcome {( to ] ] !programmer_humor
:) + Bitcoin mining :
while(true{print(money);}
i wish for the European Union to develop and become less reliant on the USA. As for this development in China, there will be (in my opinion) many effects, including a decrease in pressure on Taiwan.
2000 x 1999 x 1998 x … x 3 x2 x 1 = 2000 !
Could be useless for China since :
https://lemmy.world/post/26668055
[News] China’s Homegrown EUV Machines Rumored for Q3 Trial Production, Spelling Trouble for ASML
(…) Unlike ASML’s LPP (laser-produced plasma) method, which relies on high-energy lasers and complex FPGA-based controls, the report indicates that China’s LDP (laser-induced discharge plasma) offers a simpler design, smaller footprint, better energy efficiency, and potentially lower production costs.
(…) set for trial production for the third quarter, 2025, with mass manufacturing aimed for 2026.
There are good people everywhere… That’s true in USA and even in russia, China, North Korea … only it’s harder for them to make their voices heard. But you did, thanks for that.
Nice and open source . Similar performance to Qwen 2.5.
(also … https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/i-tested-deepseek-vs-qwen-2-5-with-7-prompts-heres-the-winner ← tested DeepSeek vs Qwen 2.5 … )
→ Qwen 2.5 is better than DeepSeek.
So, looks good.
You might have to create it : i made some more search and find nothing precisely as you asked.
Still i found this one is funny :
!iiiiiiitttttttttttt@lemmy.world
From :
https://lemmy.world/comment/15525618
@almost1337@lemm.ee
and
@FrenziedFelidFanatic@pawb.social
Nice, comma-separated array of strings for wherever that might be useful ;)
email_addresses = [ “Justin.W.Aimonetti@doge.eop.gov”, “Jacob.R.Atik@doge.eop.gov”, “Anthony.J.Armstrong@doge.eop.gov”, “Jennifer.Balajada@doge.eop.gov”, “Alexandra.T.Beynon@doge.eop.gov”, “Riccardo.N.Biasini@doge.eop.gov”, “Akash.N.Bobba@doge.eop.gov”, “Ashley.S.Boizelle@doge.eop.gov”, “Emily.L.Bryant@doge.eop.gov”, “James.Burnham@doge.eop.gov”, “Edward.H.Corstine@doge.eop.gov”, “Steven.M.Davis@doge.eop.gov”, “Marko.Elez@doge.eop.gov”, “Luke.E.Farritor@doge.eop.gov”, “Joshua.Fox@doge.eop.gov”, “Joshua.A.Hanley@doge.eop.gov”, “Stephanie.M.Holmes2@doge.eop.gov”, “Gautier.C.Killian@doge.eop.gov”, “Keenan.D.Kmiec@doge.eop.gov”, “Nicholas.Lahera@doge.eop.gov”, “Kendall.M.Lindemann@doge.eop.gov”, “erm71@who.eop.gov”, “Noah.Peters@doge.eop.gov”, “Nikhil.Rajpal@doge.eop.gov”, “Adam.Ramada@doge.eop.gov”, “Austin.L.Raynor@doge.eop.gov”, “Kyle.L.Schutt@doge.eop.gov”, “Ethan.Shaotran@doge.eop.gov”, “Brad.M.Smith@doge.eop.gov”, “Christopher.Stanley@doge.eop.gov”, “Michael.M.Wick@doge.eop.gov”, “Susan.S.Wiles@who.eop.gov”, “Christopher.J.Young@doge.eop.gov” ]
.
(…) The U.S. and Japan also negotiated the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty between 1951 and 1960, which gives the U.S. the right to maintain military bases in Japan so that it has a presence in Asia, so long as it protects Japan if the nation is attacked. (…)
Expect such military bases, not only in Japan but also in Europe, to dismantle in the following decades.
There is more in this study than “SafetyCore”
Oil works with onions 🧅 !