Ideas range from joint offensive cyber operations against Russia, and faster and more coordinated attribution of hybrid attacks by quickly pointing the finger at Moscow, to surprise NATO-led military exercises, according to two senior European government officials and three EU diplomats

“The Russians are constantly testing the limits — what is the response, how far can we go?” Latvian Foreign Minister Baiba Braže noted in an interview. A more “proactive response is needed,” she told POLITICO. “And it’s not talking that sends a signal — it’s doing.”

Finally.

  • falseWhite@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    So who exactly is doing it and to what ends, how exactly does it benefit anyone to lie about this? How come there are real politicians quoted in the article talking about retaliation? Are they also part of the conspiracy?

    You clearly haven’t even read the article and are biased with your conspiratorial beliefs.

    I get it that you hate Politico, but you should really read the article and learn to think critically for yourself.

    • Uruanna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You insist on “what is wrong in this article” .

      One of the things that popaganda does is sprinkling some real stuff to attract new people and then slowly feed them more lies.

      It doesn’t matter if you stumble upon a few good articles with real quotes - the whole thing must be avoided to reduce traffic in their direction. The proper response is to find a different source with the same quotes.

      This is thinking critically. If you know it’s from a propagandist, don’t give them more food. Your version of “thinking critically” is just “listen to the people who sound more convincing, even you know they are liars and you can’t find if this specific article has lies or not” .