• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Same guy. This time the whole thing is open source though, even the hardware. So that’s insurance for what it’s worth.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      So it’s best to wait for some other manufacturer to show up. If no one else is able to setup the manufacturing process it’s still up to this one guy to keep making them or sell and kill it again.

      • Rooster326@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It is almost always best to ‘wait and see’ for most things.

        But of course if everyone did that - it would never have taken off in the first place.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          That’s the issue. It’s why I’ve learned that when I can afford it and I reasonably believe this firm or project should exist, and it has a decent chance not to fall flat, I end up buying in. It’s literally upfront investment in the thing. I’m still salty for not backing the Ubuntu Phone back in 2012 or so. I looked at it as another phone compared to what’s available on the market and how the price stacks up for the features. That’s very much the wrong way to do it. A part of the value it provides is the existence of the project and the labour dedicated to it. In the case of the new Pebble, I’m backing it despite Eric, and because it’s fully open source and that’s something I want to exist. A fully open alternative in the sea of proprietary wearable crap.