First, the judge didn’t actually cite anyone for criminal contempt, he just said he could have.
Second, criminal contempt citations get forwarded to the DoJ for prosecution, and we all know this DoJ will find an excuse not to prosecute.
Third, they already have an excuse: this is in relation to his orders from a few weeks ago that the Supreme Court invalidated because it said the plainiffs raised the case in the wrong place. His argument is that the orders were in force right up to the point when the SC quashed it, so the government should have complied. But they are not going to investigate themselves over an order that didn’t matter in the end.
In a Wednesday order, Boasberg gave the government a deadline of April 23 either to comply with his initial order and thereby purge the contempt or, alternatively, identify members of the administration who should be subject to individual sanctions for their role.
This sounds more important than it actually is.
First, the judge didn’t actually cite anyone for criminal contempt, he just said he could have.
Second, criminal contempt citations get forwarded to the DoJ for prosecution, and we all know this DoJ will find an excuse not to prosecute.
Third, they already have an excuse: this is in relation to his orders from a few weeks ago that the Supreme Court invalidated because it said the plainiffs raised the case in the wrong place. His argument is that the orders were in force right up to the point when the SC quashed it, so the government should have complied. But they are not going to investigate themselves over an order that didn’t matter in the end.
Certainly sounds like an order to me.
Right, but they will not comply (because the initial order was eventually vacated), and the only members they will identify is DEEZ NUTS.
And whoever this judge decides to charge with contempt eventually will not be prosecuted.
FWIW, the judge did say that if the DoJ declines to prosecute, he will appoint an outside attorney to prosecute instead.
Yea it seems like if you read the whole article, you might not make wrong assumptions about the judge