• MBech@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Decent movie, but I feel like half the songs are so diconnected from the actual story.

    Like the duet with Rumi and the demon-dude the first time they actually meet. They’re all about having found their soulmate and shit, without knowing anything about eachother, and afterwards they’re back to talking to eachother like they’re complete strangers. I know this isn’t exactly new in these kinds of movies, Disney has done it for about 60 years, but at least in other movies they actually seem to give half a shit about eachother after singing about their hidden love for this total stranger.

    It just seems like most of the song were written before the story was written, to make sure the songs will carry the movie to success, instead of making something that actually makes sense.

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Now here’s what I wanna know.

    The genre is called K-Pop.

    If you look at the title, it actually says “K-Pop” in the title/logo. It’s attached to the P, but there’s clearly a dash there.

    The movie’s working title was “K-Pop: Demon Hunters” (note the added colon).

    Yet nobody leaves the hyphen in, and the Wikipedia article on the film uses the hyphen in every instance of “K-Pop” except for in the title.

    Maybe it’s just me but that’s fucking weird.

    Still love the movie, and the soundtrack; hell, I got a sticker of them on my water bottle. Just kinda weird that they do the name like that and like nobody’s asking. Maybe I’m weird for asking. Oh well. Never said I wasn’t.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Why wouldn’t it be eligible, it’s a film after all.

    Yes it’s also a music video but so is pretty much every Disney princess movie.

    • Aragaren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      For a movie to be eligible, it needs to have a theatrical run that includes being in a number of theaters for a specific length of time. Since the film was strictly on a streaming platform it initially didn’t qualify so Netflix released it in a handful of theaters to meet the minimum requirements.

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    19 hours ago

    And now the Oscar for the film most responsible for little girls still in elementary school to dress slutty for Halloween.

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Bruce Wayne: “You have a thing for bats?”

      Dr. Chase Meridian: “Oh, that’s a Rorschach, Mr. Wayne. An ink blot. People see what they want. I think the question would be do you have a thing for bats?”

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Listen, young kids have to dress appropriately otherwise sickos take advantage of them.

        The same way that drivers need to be aware of what is happening around them on the road.

        The sexualization of children is bad for a few reasons but I think the top reason is a safety concern.

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Listen, young kids have to dress appropriately otherwise sickos take advantage of them.

          The sexualization of children is bad for a few reasons but I think the top reason is a safety concern.

          In my experience, 9/10 times the people wanting to “protect” children by taking away their freedom to self-determination are actually the ones hurting the children the most.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          I thought I grew up conservative, but man, I think my childhood was nothing like yours.

          …Kids are menaces, friend.

          And I’m pretty sure exposure to K-Pop Demon Hunters would’ve helped their drug and sex habits, not exacerbated them. The kids that weren’t allowed to watch TV were wild.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I’ll tell you what’s irresponsible… Teaching elementary school kids it’s acceptable to abandon your plummeting, flaming private jet to crash uncontrolled into a populated city so you can get to your concert on time.

      Parents need to watch what their children are learning.

    • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yep, this movie made you look at elementary school girls and say “wow, how slutty”.

      Maybe Netflix will also release a true crime documentary about you!

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Yeah I think short skirts and outfits that show midriff are slutty outfits. I’m not saying that children are, but when that much skin on a child is showing its an issue because there are people that do want to see that. I get that K-pop stars often dress slutty, but there was no need for that in a pg rated film.

        Honestly parents need to do a better job at screening what their children watch and not just sit them infront of a full length movie because it’s a new PG rated film on netflix. Parents are to blame for how their 7 year old dresses ultimately. But I think it would have been nice it the outfits used in the film were picked with the idea that young children would be emulating it.

        • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          I get wanting to protect children and all, but there’s nothing “slutty” or even sexual about any of this.

          As someone who grew up in the 80s and 90s. This was very normal attire. Different cultures also have different norms.

          If you can’t see an animated kids show and not get moist you might want to look in the mirror, because that kind of thinking is not normal.

        • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Nothing on earth could get me to click a shady looking link from somebody so focused on how little children dress. Very weird shit mate.

              • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                To be fair, the link does go to a store page that shows a girl of about 7 or 8 in a short skirt and a long-sleeved halter top like outfit with exposed midriff, pretty much exactly what you’d expect if you’ve seen the movie.

                Also to be fair, there is a second option with shorts instead of a skirt.

                Nothing you wouldn’t see in clothing catalogues (showing my age here) but still kinda creepy. But, I have a young niece about that age who loves KPDH, so it’s not an unusual thing to have in my browser history. So I’m not worried. But that person isn’t entirely wrong in being weirded out by the images there.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          That link doesn’t even work outside the United States. So this seems to be a 100% your problem issue. It’s not the studio that’s pushing this it’s US manufacturers. Assuming that anyone other than you even thinks it is a problem.

          • CubitOom@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Us don’t have manufacturing. But yeah you’re right that this is not officially licensed and stuff. The real blame is on the parents letting their children watch and then wear things like this.

            The US for sure have a sexualization of little girls issue. It reminds me a lot of the cuties controversy that happened a bit ago with the little girl beauty pagents.

            I still think they should have tried to get a pg-13 rating and just leaned into it more. I mean, maybe their writing would have been considered lacking if they went for an older demographic but that’s a different thing.