• NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 hours ago

    There is no true definition of middle class. People making only $30k a month consider themselves middle class and people making $1 million also think they are middle class.

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        There are people who are fully owners and don’t do any labour, and those who subsist entirely on their labour and don’t own anything. Would it be fair to say that the middle class is anyone who works but still owns a non-zero amount of appreciating or revenue-generating assets?

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I would argue there are at least 3 classes:

        • The impoverished class that makes their living from the charity of others

        • The working class that makes their living from their labor

        • The ownership class that makes their living from owning things

        • ulterno@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          How about those that own things and control people so much that they can somehow get enough charity to live off it?
          I somehow fail to understand how that manages to be a viable method.

          • IronBird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            in sane countries you actually can go quite far on charity alone, most every civilized place on earth outside of the US fully understands that most crime is done out of desperation than anything else…so they insure there are plentiful safety nets.

            rock bottom in austrailia doesn’t compare to rock bottom in (insert red state of choice)

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        There is only ownership parasites and labour.

        FTFY. You’re welcome.

    • L7HM77@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If we guesstimate middle class by comparable lifestyle when the term was coined, it starts around 250k in today money. Comfortable house, lots of kids, multiple cars (but not luxury), at least one real traveling vacation every year, never worrying about paying bills or buying food, all while saving enough to retire by 55. There aren’t many people in the US with the income to match that. I’d say the middle class is dead.

      • WALLACE@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I always take the middle class as the threshold where you have sufficient passive income to afford a dignified lifestyle without needing to work anymore but may choose to.

        Examples would be landlords with a decent portfolio, business owners where all the work is done for them, and people with substantial savings and investments.

        If you have to work to pay the bills, no matter how much you’re on, you’re working class. This can even include millionaires in high cost lifestyles.

        If you’re so rich that you no longer need to care about the value of money then you are upper class.