TheImpressiveX@piefed.socialM to movies@piefed.socialEnglish · 1 day agoNew image from "Jumanji 3"i.postimg.ccimagemessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up158arrow-down110
arrow-up148arrow-down1imageNew image from "Jumanji 3"i.postimg.ccTheImpressiveX@piefed.socialM to movies@piefed.socialEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-squareOnomatopoeia@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·1 day agoAnd yet, the numbers still show rhere are far more today. The movies you bring up were the few sequel-based things out there, and were the exception.
minus-squareHonytawk@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoSo what if they were the exception? That shit has been going on since at least the 1960. There are a total of 25 James Bonds, there was basically a new one every year in 1960.
And yet, the numbers still show rhere are far more today.
The movies you bring up were the few sequel-based things out there, and were the exception.
So what if they were the exception? That shit has been going on since at least the 1960.
There are a total of 25 James Bonds, there was basically a new one every year in 1960.