• tomi000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I mean you do you, but there are dozens of words for it and I dont see the need to use the one invented by racists.

    Edit: invented by racists specifically to promote racism.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          This is that kind of hill that some progressives try to die on that serves absolutely no good and just perpetuates the stereotype that the left is full of “thought police” and want to make laws about words.

          Let’s focus this energy against enemies, and there are plenty.

          • tomi000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            Would you say the same about the n-word? This is the exact same argument people used to make when the efforts of getting rid of its frequent use started growing.

            I dont see the point of not making informative statements in an already progressive bubble. How would you suggest I “focus the energy against enemies” in a lemmy thread aboud weed?

            • ameancow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              It’s absolutely not the same, one word offends a lot of people broadly because it signals how you feel about them, and the other doesn’t do that, the other is a word that people of all races and backgrounds use and is never used as a signal from people to show how they feel about a race or minority group, at least not in the modern world. Nobody is going to call you a racist for using the word marijuana… except if we start cycling what you’re saying here, in this bubble of dry kindling and impressionable minds looking to police each other, then there WILL be debates about the word, and it will continue to bleed into other spaces and make leftists infight because it’s a stupid thing to try to chastise people about, and it will become another performative issue that makes people roll their eyes at activism in general.

              Honestly I wouldn’t bring it up at all. If you’re not in an etymology discussion, what good do you POSSIBLY expect to come from educating people about this? What is your end-goal? Do you actually think it’s worth the energy of even trying to get people to change their language for no good reason when it serves no real good or have any real benefits?