• dubyakay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    A car that is shared between at least ten other people on the road that day is bad.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That’s… insane logic. It’s still a car running all day. It’s the exact same as ten other people driving their own cars for a half hour each, one after another. Worse, actually, because there’s extra trips to pick up people in between the actual transportation parts.

      (Caveat: unless it’s an electric car. I’m going to assume at least 8/10 of the drivers in this scenario are driving standard ICE, rather than hybrid or full electric at this point.)

      • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        How is it “insane” logic? A car share has lower environmental impact over individual car ownership. Does it suck compared to alternatives? Sure. But it’s not the same as ten individuals riding their cars, since

        • it can be used by more than one passenger at the same time
        • an individual car will still need to drive to pick up a passenger (think parents picking up their kids or spouses and back again)
        • they take up city subsidized real estate to park their cars (if not, because they are in a suburban sprawl drive way, that’s its own problem already)

        Either way, I was bringing it up as an example: Costco can also be accessed by public transit, but it’s not “accessible”. It takes an hour to get there, including ~15 minutes of walking along an area that has a sliver of a sidewalk. Compared to 17 minute by car (traffic not withstanding) or 23 minutes of biking. I do this ride/transit there and Uber back again maybe twice a year, but I wish I didn’t have to.