Lawyers for Luigi Mangione, charged with killing UnitedHealthcare’s chief executive, are asking for details about a reported meeting between the White House and an executive with the insurer.
Lawyers for the man accused of assassinating the chief executive of UnitedHealthcare, asked a federal judge on Friday to let them investigate whether the Justice Department and company officials have cooperated to “malign and prejudice” their client.
The request is the latest turn in a festering dispute that began after Trump administration officials said repeatedly that the man, Luigi Mangione, is guilty. The judge in the case has said the comments may violate her order prohibiting the parties from making statements that could affect Mr. Mangione’s ability to receive a fair trial.
Huh, was about to say hell yeah, good on them. I thought I remembered seeing something weird about United Health and Peter Thiel earlier this year, but when I tried to find it, instead I came across this, which somehow completely escaped my attention until now:
Alleged CEO killer praised Elon Musk and backed Peter Thiel in social media posts
Luigi was antiwoke?
It’s very rare that one person is right all the time.
Yeah, it’s just kinda weird that he’s become the face of the radical left if he believed wokeism was destroying America.
His family’s conservative radio connection seems especially weird. There’s so much that seems weird about the shooting itself, and him somehow getting away unnoticed in NYC after shooting somebody on the street like that. Then getting caught loitering in a McDonald’s in the same clothes. Idk kinda gives off patsy vibes.
I know it’s not very woke of me to judge someone based on looks, but… I mean… It’s kind of obvious.
That he’s antiwoke or a patsy?
Does it matter which one? It fulfulls both.
I guess it depends on what’s actually true about him, but if everything I recall being blasted about him is true, he would be an antiwoke bi revolutionary.
At this point, Idk why, but I’m always a little surprised when people support propaganda that at it’s core is directly opposed to their own existence. I guess it’s just easier to pretend the rules would somehow be different if the propaganda became policy bc you’re “one of the good ones.” Although, I guess that common error in judgement also lines up pretty well with how patsies historically find themselves turned into a public scapegoat.
If that’s the case, that does actually make sense, bc how else do you explain somebody being smart enough to walk away from a very public murder without getting caught immediately, yet writing a full ass manifesto about hating greedy CEOs, while somehow idolizing tech CEOs?