Overnight on Tuesday, Sept. 30, federal agents from different agencies raided an apartment building on the South Side of Chicago, the nation’s third-largest city by population. Armed federal agents in military fatigues busted down doors, pulling men, women and children — some of them allegedly naked — from their apartments, residents and witnesses told the Chicago Sun-Times.

A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security said agents with Border Patrol, the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives arrested 37 people without legal immigration status, including some with criminal records. The spokesperson claimed the South Shore neighborhood is “a location known to be frequented by Tren de Aragua members and their associates.”

“Due to the size of this operation, DHS law enforcement is continuing to gather more information on those arrested and will provide more information when available,” the spokesperson said. “Federal law enforcement officers will not stand by and allow criminal activity flourish in our American neighborhoods.”

  • untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They wouldn’t really have a way if preventing this from happening altogether. So you have to increase the risk to the lessee for bad behavior.

    Point of sale is the only place they ID the customer. At that point you determine whether the lease is to a legal entity (Gov/corp) or Private. If the trucks were contracted to DHS or a contractor then this is moot and fuck 'em. If they were contracted as a private lease to an agent concealing the purpose then a couple options could be:

    • imposing maximum fees associated with breach of ToS
    • Suing the individual for fraudulent use, possibly criminal, or damage to the brand, even if the lessee is immune.

    I’m unsure if Uhaul is franchised, but in that case there is less clarity in the options. Corporate could pressure them depending on contract language.

    End if the day, unless it is seen as an economic threat to the brand, nothing will likely be done.

    Note: i don’t usually think that punitive action is useful but it’s all these bastards know.

    • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Indeed. I’m sure there is already language in the terms against driving the vehicles with people in the cargo space. Breaking this could result in some penalty. If the company found, of course.

      Unfortunately, if they were to bundle up dozens of these individuals renting trucks on behalf of ICE and were then able to go after the agency itself for this practice of purposefully violating their TOS, the opposition is the government. I wouldn’t put it past the current administration to nationalize U-Haul as punishment in such a situation.

      I agree about the punitive damages. There should be life long consequences for everyone involved with ICE.