• Elextra@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Honestly, I think unfortunately gender/sex does play a factor, in addition to race. If this administration has taught us anything, is that there is that much hate within our country.

    Also think of cultures where historically their culture doesnt value women. Even if there are people who immigrated here, some still may never vote for a woman. Some will decline because they are racist. While we are all Americans, we are deeply deeply divided ATM :(

    This is without even factoring the candidates political platform in yet.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I like when people claim racism was a major factor in Harris’s loss, given that Obama was elected in 2008 with a larger piece of the popular vote than any President since.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It was one of many factors. Obama winning didn’t prove that racism didn’t exist. He won despite the racism. Harris had racism, sexism, a lack of a primary process, the lack of experience as an executive, and so on against her.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          In a lot of ways, Obama winning kind of broke the country.

          He was a Democrat that people genuinely loved because of how charismatic he was (which was REAL nice after Dubyah…). Or, as a certain Former President put it, he was a Clean And Articulate Gentleman.

          The problem being, his very existence set off all the chuds. It completely destroyed their minds that a black man could possibly be President. And it is a big chunk of what set for the “never again” mindset we are seeing.

        • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Obama winning didn’t prove that racism didn’t exist.

          But it did prove that racism does not have enough of an impact to move the needle in any substantial way—it failed so hard to move the needle that, again, literally no candidate since has even matched, let alone topped, his popular vote %.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            But it did prove that racism does not have enough of an impact to move the needle in any substantial way

            Are you sure? Maybe Obama would have swept all 50 states if it hadn’t been for the racism. Maybe the only reason it was at all close was the racism.

      • frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Given the close margins I would say it surely played at least a part for Harris losing. Obama won by large enough margins that even if all the racists stayed home that he still won in a landslide.

        If even 2% of the population would never vote for a women or a person of color then it was enough to have mattered when others are sitting home for other reasons. It’s certainly not the main cause of Harris losing as you pointed out, but when the margins were that close every vote did matter.

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          If even 2% of the population would never vote for a women or a person of color then it was enough to have mattered

          I suspect the majority of that 2% would also never vote for a Democrat.

          • frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I believe that you are mostly correct, although the actual motivations for these folks are complicated. Some may value a few extra bucks in government support, having social security, and having Medicare programs. So there are some economic reasons they may vote for Democrats on occasion, but their bigotry could get in the way of their best interest.

            So, some of those people probably just stay home for election night. While a good chunk may be getting convinced to vote for Republicans if they feel their bigotry is being rewarded.

        • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Given that, while Trump got ~3 million more votes in 2024 vs. 2020, and Harris got nearly 7 million fewer votes in 2024 than Biden did in 2020, and that the US’s population increased about 8 million in that span of time, are you suggesting that there’s that much misogyny and racism among the Democrats?

          • frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            The total population is not the total voting population. There was also a pandemic between 2020 and 2024 so I would expect the total amount of eligible voters would be different as a result of the pandemic.

            I think that’s an uncharitable takeaway from what I’m talking about to say that the misogyny and racism were the core reasons that Harris got less votes. There were notable other factors that made it a close election, which I mentioned was the case. My point was more that because the margins were that close that those smaller details did matter more.