cm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 18 days agoAstronomy Factsimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1313arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1309arrow-down1imageAstronomy Factscm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 18 days agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareZloubida@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·18 days agoIt’s all relative in space 😅. But I could reformulate my question: are visible today in our night sky stars that weren’t visible less than 100 years ago?
minus-squareTabbsTheBat@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up10·18 days agohttps://www.space.com/astronomers-new-star-nova-explosion-t-coronae-borealis Not exactly the question, but while looking into it I found this :3 a star visible once every 80 years
minus-squarebstix@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up3·18 days agoThe Milky Way is visible. It’s estimated that approximately 6 new stars are formed in the Milky every year.
minus-squareOrganicMustard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·18 days agoThere are still stars forming, so probably yes if you use a super telescope
minus-squareJolteon@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·16 days agoIn order for the stars to actually be less than 100 years old, they would also need to be with a hundred light years of us.
It’s all relative in space 😅. But I could reformulate my question: are visible today in our night sky stars that weren’t visible less than 100 years ago?
https://www.space.com/astronomers-new-star-nova-explosion-t-coronae-borealis
Not exactly the question, but while looking into it I found this :3 a star visible once every 80 years
The Milky Way is visible. It’s estimated that approximately 6 new stars are formed in the Milky every year.
There are still stars forming, so probably yes if you use a super telescope
In order for the stars to actually be less than 100 years old, they would also need to be with a hundred light years of us.