It was a nonsense answer and dodged the question. It doesn’t say anything. All in all, a prime example of negativity, and it seems that they might be habitually negative by the looks of their profile picture and history with politics
I’m sure it does, just like you reek of concern trolling and AI slop responses. Very unoriginal and very pathetic. Are you incapable of trolling on your own? Or are you so bored and unwanted in your pathetic existence that you seek and crave any sort of attention even if it’s negative?
The 2023 study found that individuals with negative and unstable self-perceptions are drawn to anonymity and seek the freedom to take on different personas to satisfy various needs. Individuals struggling with self-consciousness and low self-esteem also prefer to remain anonymous online.
Further, individuals with dark personality traits seem to express malevolent identities from the shadows of anonymity to engage in behaviors that gratify them, but harm others. A 2022 study published in Personality and Individual Differences examined the relationship between online anonymity and the following dark personality traits:
Machiavellianism. Individuals seeking anonymity are high in machiavellianism. This trait is associated with being manipulative and presenting deceptive and adaptable identities online. Digital environments offer people a risk-free opportunity to create personas strategically to achieve iniquitous and self-serving goals.
Psychopathy. A higher level of psychopathy, characterized by antisocial behavior and a lack of empathy or remorse, points to a greater likelihood of presenting an adaptable and inauthentic self online and deceiving others using anonymity.
Sadism. According to the 2023 study, sadism is positively associated with preferring an anonymous presence online to fulfill the need to enjoy others’ suffering, safely from behind a screen.
Are you running many of your replies through LLMs and just posting the output here? Is that the reason behind the bizarre phrasing of some of your posts and weird non-sequiturs? 🤔
How do you expect me to respond to this?
You just did.
Was that what you expected?
It was a nonsense answer and dodged the question. It doesn’t say anything. All in all, a prime example of negativity, and it seems that they might be habitually negative by the looks of their profile picture and history with politics
Relax I was poking fun. Learn about it sometime.
yeah ok pal. Narcissistic talking style.
By telling you to lighten up? You’re ridiculous.
Each comment of yours fits the narcissistic style of speaking: Invalidation, blaming, emotional immaturity, you-statements.
I’m sure it does, just like you reek of concern trolling and AI slop responses. Very unoriginal and very pathetic. Are you incapable of trolling on your own? Or are you so bored and unwanted in your pathetic existence that you seek and crave any sort of attention even if it’s negative?
Person could be having some fun with you though is all.
Sure, but that’s still anti-social behavior.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2024/02/03/a-psychologist-explains-why-internet-trolls-thrive-on-anonymity/
I’m still not convinced this user isn’t a bot.
Ok and who are you? Why should anyone care about whether you are convinced or not? Are you a bouncer at a private club?
Are you running many of your replies through LLMs and just posting the output here? Is that the reason behind the bizarre phrasing of some of your posts and weird non-sequiturs? 🤔